ME6 - Solving exponential and logarithmic equations

ME6 - Solving exponential and logarithmic equations

Solve exponential equations by choosing logarithms, equal bases or a positive substitution. Check logarithm domains, interpret numerical intersections, and solve related inequalities using the direction of the exponential or logarithm.

Taking logarithms to find an exponent

Can changing only an exponential’s base reverse a whole solution interval? At x=3x=3, 2x=82^x=8 but (1/2)x=1/8(1/2)^x=1/8. One rises as the input rises; the other falls. First find equality accurately, then use direction to decide the interval.

You already know

For u>0u>0, ln⁡(ur)=rln⁡u\ln(u^r)=r\ln u. Natural logarithms undo natural exponentials. Positive-base exponentials other than base 1 are one-to-one; reciprocal bases reverse the direction of change.

An exponent becomes a multiplier when you take logarithms of two positive sides.

Recovering an exponent

For a>0a>0, a≠1a\ne1, b>0b>0,

ax=b⇒xln⁡a=ln⁡b⇒x=ln⁡bln⁡a.a^x=b\quad\Rightarrow\quad x\ln a=\ln b\quad\Rightarrow\quad x=\frac{\ln b}{\ln a}.

This is a consequence of the power law, obtained by taking logarithms of both sides.

Not in the formula sheet: learn it.

You may use a consistent base-ten logarithm instead. Keep exact logarithms until the end, rather than rounding each one separately.

Worked example 1: a linear exponent

Question. Determine the exact solution of 3x+2=103^{x+2}=10.

Plan. Take natural logarithms and solve for the complete exponent.

(x+2)ln⁡3=ln⁡10power lawx+2=ln⁡10ln⁡3divide by nonzero ln⁡3x=ln⁡10ln⁡3−2isolate x\begin{aligned} (x+2)\ln3&=\ln10 &&\text{power law}\\ x+2&=\frac{\ln10}{\ln3} &&\text{divide by nonzero }\ln3\\ x&=\frac{\ln10}{\ln3}-2 &&\text{isolate }x \end{aligned}

Why this step? The brackets keep both terms of x+2x+2 multiplying the logarithm.

Answer. x=ln⁡10/ln⁡3−2x=\ln10/\ln3-2.

Check. The resulting exponent is ln⁡10/ln⁡3\ln10/\ln3, so the logarithm of the left side is exactly ln⁡10\ln10.

Change only the right side from the constant 10 to 10x10^x.

Worked example 2: different bases on both sides

Question. Determine the exact solution of 3x+2=10x3^{x+2}=10^x.

Plan. Take logarithms of both sides, expand, and collect the terms containing xx.

(x+2)ln⁡3=xln⁡10power law on both sides2ln⁡3=x(ln⁡10−ln⁡3)collect termsx=2ln⁡3ln⁡(10/3)solve\begin{aligned} (x+2)\ln3&=x\ln10 &&\text{power law on both sides}\\ 2\ln3&=x(\ln10-\ln3) &&\text{collect terms}\\ x&=\frac{2\ln3}{\ln(10/3)} &&\text{solve} \end{aligned}

Why this step? Different bases are manageable once each variable exponent becomes a multiplier.

Answer. x=2ln⁡3/ln⁡(10/3)x=2\ln3/\ln(10/3).

Check. Numerically x≈1.82498x\approx1.82498; using the exact form makes (x+2)ln⁡3−xln⁡10=0(x+2)\ln3-x\ln10=0.

For a natural exponential, isolate it first. Thus 4e2x−1=74\mathrm e^{2x-1}=7 gives 2x−1=ln⁡(7/4)2x-1=\ln(7/4), so x=(1+ln⁡(7/4))/2x=(1+\ln(7/4))/2. Likewise 2x+1=3x−12^{x+1}=3^{x-1} leads to x=ln⁡6/ln⁡(3/2)x=\ln6/\ln(3/2).

Watch out

The equation ax=ba^x=b with a>0a>0 cannot have a real solution if b≤0b\le0. Base 1 is exceptional: 1x=11^x=1 holds for all real inputs, while 1x=b≠11^x=b\ne1 has no solution. Dividing by ln⁡1\ln1 is invalid.

Try a case where the exact exponent turns out to be negative.

Equal bases and exponential substitutions

A common base may remove the need for logarithms, or reveal a familiar quadratic hidden inside an exponential equation.

For 32x−1=27=333^{2x-1}=27=3^3, equal outputs imply 2x−1=32x-1=3, so x=2x=2. The argument works for a decreasing positive-base exponential too, because it is still one-to-one. Base 1 is excluded. For 22x=(2x)22^{2x}=(2^x)^2, the substitution u=2x>0u=2^x>0 gives a quadratic in uu; similarly, 2x+1=2u2^{x+1}=2u. These index identities are not supplied on the formula sheet.

Worked example 3: a quadratic in a positive quantity

Question. Determine all real solutions of 22x−5(2x)−6=02^{2x}-5(2^x)-6=0.

Plan. Let u=2x>0u=2^x>0, factorise, and convert positive candidates back to xx.

u2−5u−6=(u−6)(u+1)=0substitute and factoriseu=6 or −1quadratic roots2x=6reject negative ux=ln⁡6ln⁡2take logarithms\begin{aligned} u^2-5u-6&=(u-6)(u+1)=0 &&\text{substitute and factorise}\\ u&=6\text{ or }-1 &&\text{quadratic roots}\\ 2^x&=6 &&\text{reject negative }u\\ x&=\frac{\ln6}{\ln2} &&\text{take logarithms} \end{aligned}

Why this step? The quadratic can have negative roots, but the substituted quantity cannot be negative.

Answer. x=ln⁡6/ln⁡2x=\ln6/\ln2 only.

Check. The starting expression becomes 36−30−6=036-30-6=0.

Change only the constant term, from −6-6 to 6.

Worked example 4: keeping both positive roots

Question. Determine all real solutions of 22x−5(2x)+6=02^{2x}-5(2^x)+6=0.

Plan. Use the same substitution and retain every positive root.

u2−5u+6=(u−2)(u−3)=0factoriseu=2 or 3both positivex=1 or ln⁡3ln⁡2solve each exponential\begin{aligned} u^2-5u+6&=(u-2)(u-3)=0 &&\text{factorise}\\ u&=2\text{ or }3 &&\text{both positive}\\ x&=1\text{ or }\frac{\ln3}{\ln2} &&\text{solve each exponential} \end{aligned}

Why this step? Returning from each valid uu-value is essential; the question asks for xx, not uu.

Answer. x=1x=1 or x=ln⁡3/ln⁡2x=\ln3/\ln2.

Check. The starting left sides are 4−10+6=04-10+6=0 and 9−15+6=09-15+6=0.

With base e\mathrm e, the same method solves e2x−3ex−4=0\mathrm e^{2x}-3\mathrm e^x-4=0: its exponential candidates are 4,−14,-1, so only x=ln⁡4x=\ln4 is valid.

Exam tip

For detailed reasoning, explain a rejection by writing that the exponential is strictly positive for all real inputs. A bare “not possible” does not identify the reason.

Change the constant again while keeping the quadratic's other coefficients fixed.

Logarithmic equations and original domains

An algebraic candidate is a logarithmic solution only when every starting argument is positive.

For positive U,VU,V, ln⁡U=ln⁡V\ln U=\ln V implies U=VU=V, because ln⁡\ln is one-to-one. For a numerical right side instead, exponentiate: ln⁡(2x+1)=3\ln(2x+1)=3 gives x=(e3−1)/2x=(\mathrm e^3-1)/2. These inverse properties are not supplied on the formula sheet.

Worked example 5: filtering a quadratic

Question. Solve ln⁡(x−2)+ln⁡(x+1)=ln⁡10\ln(x-2)+\ln(x+1)=\ln10.

Plan. Record the full domain, combine logarithms, then check both candidates.

x>2both arguments positive(x−2)(x+1)=10product law and injectivityx2−x−12=(x−4)(x+3)=0rearrange and factorisex=4 or −3algebraic candidates\begin{aligned} x&>2 &&\text{both arguments positive}\\ (x-2)(x+1)&=10 &&\text{product law and injectivity}\\ x^2-x-12&=(x-4)(x+3)=0 &&\text{rearrange and factorise}\\ x&=4\text{ or }-3 &&\text{algebraic candidates} \end{aligned}

Why this step? A positive product can hide two negative starting arguments.

Answer. Only x=4x=4 satisfies x>2x>2.

Check. ln⁡2+ln⁡5=ln⁡10\ln2+\ln5=\ln10. At −3-3, both starting arguments are negative, so that candidate is invalid.

Change only addition to subtraction between the logarithms.

Worked example 6: an equation with no real solution

Question. Solve ln⁡(x−2)−ln⁡(x+1)=ln⁡10\ln(x-2)-\ln(x+1)=\ln10.

Plan. Keep the domain x>2x>2, and use the quotient law.

x−2x+1=10quotient law and injectivityx−2=10x+10multiply by x+1>0x=−43solve\begin{aligned} \frac{x-2}{x+1}&=10 &&\text{quotient law and injectivity}\\ x-2&=10x+10 &&\text{multiply by }x+1>0\\ x&=-\frac43 &&\text{solve} \end{aligned}

Why this step? Solving the combined equation cannot override the domain of the two separate logarithms.

Answer. No real solution: −4/3-4/3 is outside x>2x>2.

Check. For x>2x>2, the quotient lies between zero and 1; it cannot equal 10.

The familiar sum ln⁡(x−1)+ln⁡(x+2)=ln⁡4\ln(x-1)+\ln(x+2)=\ln4 similarly gives 2,−32,-3, with only 2 valid. An argument equal to zero is excluded too, even when another argument is positive.

Continue this lesson.

You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.

Create free account