Mc32, Mc33 - Separable differential equations and their solutions
Solve first-order differential equations analytically, using direct integration or separation of variables. You will use initial information, preserve equilibrium solutions, identify valid intervals and interpret a supplied motion model without extending it beyond its assumptions.
Solutions and initial information
Can one acceleration law describe an object speeding up and another slowing down towards the same velocity? Take the supplied model , with downward velocity positive. At , acceleration is ; at , it is , in . Both point towards . We will find the two motions and decide whether either reaches that value in finite time.
You already know
Direct integration recovers a function from its derivative. Integration by parts is , and is in the formula sheet. The chain rule checks a recovered composite function.
The equation determines the family; the initial information selects a member of that family.
General and particular solutions
A solution is a differentiable function satisfying the differential equation on its stated interval. A general solution includes an arbitrary constant. An initial condition can determine that constant and produce a particular solution. For example, solves , while selects .
When the derivative is a function of the independent variable alone, direct integration is enough. This method is not in the formula sheet: learn it. The integral itself may require a method you already know.
Worked example 1: direct integration can involve parts
Question. Solve , given .
Plan. Integrate by parts, integrate the remaining exponential, then use the initial condition.
For the first term, take and , so .
Why this step? Differentiating the linear factor simplifies it, so integration by parts removes the product without introducing a harder integral.
Answer. , for real .
Check. , and .
Change only the constant inside the derivative's bracket from to . The integral's constant coefficient changes sign at the earlier integration step, not at the end.
Worked example 2: one changed term
Question. Solve , given .
Plan. Reuse the parts calculation for , then integrate the changed exponential term.
Why this step? The integral of is , so it adds to the negative exponential contribution from integration by parts.
Answer. .
Check. , and .
For a simpler direct example, gives ; then gives . Fitting a point does not excuse an incorrect derivative: both must be checked.
Intervals also matter. The equation gives separately on and . An initial condition at selects the right-hand interval, without allowing the solution through the undefined input .
Watch out
Wrong: set equal to the initial ordinate before substituting the input. Right: put both coordinates into the entire integrated expression. In the second example, , although .
Try a different linear factor and initial value. Keep the complete integration visible.
Separating variables before integration
An equation involving both and may still be simple after factorisation. Look for one factor containing only , multiplied by one containing only .
Separable equation
An equation is separable when it can be written . For example, is a separable right-hand side. An unfactorised sum such as is not a product of that form.
Move the entire dependent-variable factor to the left before either integral is taken.
Separation of variables
Where ,
Check solutions from separately. Integrate on an interval where the equation and the chosen solution are defined.
Not in the formula sheet: learn it.
This rearrangement reflects the chain rule: the derivative with respect to of the left integral is . It does not allow us to integrate with respect to while pretending a changing is constant.
Worked example 3: a common factor reveals the method
Question. Solve , given .
Plan. Factor the right side, separate and use the point condition after integration.
Why this step? Exponentiating gives a multiplicative constant. Its sign must also record whether is positive or negative.
Answer. , for real . The equilibrium does not satisfy the initial condition.
Check. , and .
Change only the initial value to . The solution now lies on the other side of the equilibrium, so the sign hidden by the absolute value becomes essential.
Worked example 4: the negative branch
Question. Solve , given .
Plan. Use the separated family, retaining a real signed multiplier rather than assuming it is positive.
Why this step? Writing would discard every solution below . A signed constant includes the negative branch too.
Answer. , for real .
Check. ; differentiating gives .
For the unshifted equation , the same method gives . The condition gives . Check separately: it satisfies the equation, even though the logarithmic step excludes it. Similarly, , , gives , by integrating and fitting the multiplier. These derived solution families are not printed in the formula sheet.
Exam tip
Show the separated equation before integrating when detailed reasoning is requested. After removing logarithms, use a multiplicative constant: an added outside the exponential is generally wrong.
The next equation changes the common coefficient and the initial value. Start by grouping its four terms.
Recovering equilibria and choosing a valid branch
The interval of a solution can be narrower than the domain of its differential equation. A denominator that appears while solving may create a finite-time pole.
Equilibrium solution
An equilibrium solution is a constant function satisfying the equation. For , and are equilibria because both sides are zero. Dividing by excludes them from the subsequent calculation, rather than proving they do not exist.
Use partial fractions to integrate the other solutions, then fit the branch and interval to the initial information.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account