1.06g - Solving exponential and logarithmic equations
Choose equal bases, logarithms or a substitution to solve exponential equations. Preserve logarithm domains when checking candidates, and recognise when a graph intersection gives a useful numerical answer instead of a simple algebraic one.
Taking logarithms to find an exponent
Will taking logarithms always free an unknown exponent? Compare with . The first can be untangled exactly; in the second, the unknown stays tangled inside another expression. We will learn where to change approach.
You already know
For positive , . The identities and undo exponentials and logarithms. Keep brackets around a whole exponent.
For the first opening equation, isolate the exponential: , then . Thus , and exact substitution gives .
Solving a positive-base exponential
For , , ,
This follows by taking natural logarithms of both sides and using the power law.
Not in the formula sheet: learn it.
The denominator is nonzero because . This argument uses log laws, without requiring a change-of-base rule.
Worked example 1: a linear exponent
Question. Solve , giving an exact answer.
Plan. Take natural logarithms and solve the resulting linear equation.
Why this step? The entire exponent multiplies ; losing its brackets loses the constant term.
Answer. .
Check. The exponent is , so taking the logarithm of the resulting left side gives , as required.
Change only the right side from a constant to an exponential involving .
Worked example 2: exponentials on both sides
Question. Solve exactly.
Plan. Take logarithms of both positive sides, then collect the terms containing .
Why this step? Different bases do not prevent a linear equation once both exponents become multipliers.
Answer. .
Check. With this value, , so the two positive sides have equal logarithms and are equal.
The same route gives . Base-ten logarithms used consistently give the same answers. Keep unrounded values until the final line.
Watch out
For , has no real solution when . For base 1, has every real input as a solution if , and none otherwise. Never divide by .
Try the two-variable-exponent structure with fresh bases.
Equal bases and exponential substitutions
First look for a common base; then ask whether one exponential can stand in for the unknown.
For , the one-to-one exponential gives , so . Equal-exponent reasoning also works with , but not with base 1. When terms contain and , the identity creates a quadratic. For a general positive base, may expose the same structure. These index identities are not supplied on the formula sheet.
Worked example 3: one admissible exponential value
Question. Solve .
Plan. Put , solve the quadratic, then return to .
Why this step? The substitution has range , so is rejected before attempting a logarithm.
Answer. only.
Check. The starting left side becomes .
Change only the constant term, from to 2; now both quadratic roots can survive.
Worked example 4: two admissible exponential values
Question. Solve .
Plan. Use the same positive substitution and check both roots.
Why this step? Reject roots using the range, not a habit of keeping only one answer.
Answer. or .
Check. Substitution gives and .
A quadratic root is a value of , not yet a value of .
Exam tip
If asked to explain a rejection, say “ for every real ”. A statement such as “negative logarithms are impossible” is false and does not justify the rejection.
Change the constant once more; the quadratic formula now gives exact surds.
Logarithmic equations and original domains
A log equation can produce algebraic candidates that do not belong to its starting domain.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account