1.06g - Solving exponential and logarithmic equations

1.06g - Solving exponential and logarithmic equations

Choose equal bases, logarithms or a substitution to solve exponential equations. Preserve logarithm domains when checking candidates, and recognise when a graph intersection gives a useful numerical answer instead of a simple algebraic one.

Taking logarithms to find an exponent

Will taking logarithms always free an unknown exponent? Compare 4e2x−1=74\mathrm e^{2x-1}=7 with ex=3−x\mathrm e^x=3-x. The first can be untangled exactly; in the second, the unknown stays tangled inside another expression. We will learn where to change approach.

You already know

For positive uu, ln⁡(ur)=rln⁡u\ln(u^r)=r\ln u. The identities ln⁡(ev)=v\ln(\mathrm e^v)=v and eln⁡u=u\mathrm e^{\ln u}=u undo exponentials and logarithms. Keep brackets around a whole exponent.

For the first opening equation, isolate the exponential: e2x−1=7/4\mathrm e^{2x-1}=7/4, then 2x−1=ln⁡(7/4)2x-1=\ln(7/4). Thus x=(1+ln⁡(7/4))/2≈0.780x=(1+\ln(7/4))/2\approx0.780, and exact substitution gives 4eln⁡(7/4)=74\mathrm e^{\ln(7/4)}=7.

Solving a positive-base exponential

For a>0a>0, a≠1a\ne1, b>0b>0,

ax=b⇒xln⁡a=ln⁡b⇒x=ln⁡bln⁡a.a^x=b\quad\Rightarrow\quad x\ln a=\ln b\quad\Rightarrow\quad x=\frac{\ln b}{\ln a}.

This follows by taking natural logarithms of both sides and using the power law.

Not in the formula sheet: learn it.

The denominator is nonzero because a≠1a\ne1. This argument uses log laws, without requiring a change-of-base rule.

Worked example 1: a linear exponent

Question. Solve 52x−1=125^{2x-1}=12, giving an exact answer.

Plan. Take natural logarithms and solve the resulting linear equation.

(2x−1)ln⁡5=ln⁡12power law2x−1=ln⁡12ln⁡5divide by nonzero ln⁡5x=1+ln⁡12/ln⁡52isolate x\begin{aligned} (2x-1)\ln5&=\ln12 &&\text{power law}\\ 2x-1&=\frac{\ln12}{\ln5} &&\text{divide by nonzero }\ln5\\ x&=\frac{1+\ln12/\ln5}{2} &&\text{isolate }x \end{aligned}

Why this step? The entire exponent multiplies ln⁡5\ln5; losing its brackets loses the constant term.

Answer. x=12(1+ln⁡12/ln⁡5)x=\tfrac12(1+\ln12/\ln5).

Check. The exponent is ln⁡12/ln⁡5\ln12/\ln5, so taking the logarithm of the resulting left side gives ln⁡12\ln12, as required.

Change only the right side from a constant to an exponential involving xx.

Worked example 2: exponentials on both sides

Question. Solve 52x−1=12x5^{2x-1}=12^x exactly.

Plan. Take logarithms of both positive sides, then collect the terms containing xx.

(2x−1)ln⁡5=xln⁡12power law on both sidesx(2ln⁡5−ln⁡12)=ln⁡5collect x termsx=ln⁡5ln⁡(25/12)solve the linear equation\begin{aligned} (2x-1)\ln5&=x\ln12 &&\text{power law on both sides}\\ x(2\ln5-\ln12)&=\ln5 &&\text{collect }x\text{ terms}\\ x&=\frac{\ln5}{\ln(25/12)} &&\text{solve the linear equation} \end{aligned}

Why this step? Different bases do not prevent a linear equation once both exponents become multipliers.

Answer. x=ln⁡5/ln⁡(25/12)x=\ln5/\ln(25/12).

Check. With this value, x(2ln⁡5−ln⁡12)−ln⁡5=0x(2\ln5-\ln12)-\ln5=0, so the two positive sides have equal logarithms and are equal.

The same route gives 2x+1=3x−1⇒x=ln⁡6/ln⁡(3/2)≈4.422^{x+1}=3^{x-1}\Rightarrow x=\ln6/\ln(3/2)\approx4.42. Base-ten logarithms used consistently give the same answers. Keep unrounded values until the final line.

Watch out

For b≤0b\le0, ax=ba^x=b has no real solution when a>0a>0. For base 1, 1x=b1^x=b has every real input as a solution if b=1b=1, and none otherwise. Never divide by ln⁡1=0\ln1=0.

Try the two-variable-exponent structure with fresh bases.

Equal bases and exponential substitutions

First look for a common base; then ask whether one exponential can stand in for the unknown.

For 32x−1=27=333^{2x-1}=27=3^3, the one-to-one exponential gives 2x−1=32x-1=3, so x=2x=2. Equal-exponent reasoning also works with 0<a<10<a<1, but not with base 1. When terms contain e2x\mathrm e^{2x} and ex\mathrm e^x, the identity e2x=(ex)2\mathrm e^{2x}=(\mathrm e^x)^2 creates a quadratic. For a general positive base, ax+1=a axa^{x+1}=a\,a^x may expose the same structure. These index identities are not supplied on the formula sheet.

Worked example 3: one admissible exponential value

Question. Solve e2x−3ex−4=0\mathrm e^{2x}-3\mathrm e^x-4=0.

Plan. Put u=ex>0u=\mathrm e^x>0, solve the quadratic, then return to xx.

u2−3u−4=0substitute u=ex(u−4)(u+1)=0factoriseu=4 or −1quadratic candidatesex=4⇒x=ln⁡4retain only positive u\begin{aligned} u^2-3u-4&=0 &&\text{substitute }u=\mathrm e^x\\ (u-4)(u+1)&=0 &&\text{factorise}\\ u&=4\text{ or }-1 &&\text{quadratic candidates}\\ \mathrm e^x&=4\quad\Rightarrow\quad x=\ln4 &&\text{retain only positive }u \end{aligned}

Why this step? The substitution has range u>0u>0, so −1-1 is rejected before attempting a logarithm.

Answer. x=ln⁡4x=\ln4 only.

Check. The starting left side becomes 16−12−4=016-12-4=0.

Change only the constant term, from −4-4 to 2; now both quadratic roots can survive.

Worked example 4: two admissible exponential values

Question. Solve e2x−3ex+2=0\mathrm e^{2x}-3\mathrm e^x+2=0.

Plan. Use the same positive substitution and check both roots.

u2−3u+2=(u−1)(u−2)=0factorise in uu=1 or 2both positivex=ln⁡1=0 or ln⁡2return to x\begin{aligned} u^2-3u+2&=(u-1)(u-2)=0 &&\text{factorise in }u\\ u&=1\text{ or }2 &&\text{both positive}\\ x&=\ln1=0\text{ or }\ln2 &&\text{return to }x \end{aligned}

Why this step? Reject roots using the range, not a habit of keeping only one answer.

Answer. x=0x=0 or x=ln⁡2x=\ln2.

Check. Substitution gives 1−3+2=01-3+2=0 and 4−6+2=04-6+2=0.

A quadratic root is a value of uu, not yet a value of xx.

Exam tip

If asked to explain a rejection, say “ex>0\mathrm e^x>0 for every real xx”. A statement such as “negative logarithms are impossible” is false and does not justify the rejection.

Change the constant once more; the quadratic formula now gives exact surds.

Logarithmic equations and original domains

A log equation can produce algebraic candidates that do not belong to its starting domain.

Continue this lesson.

You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.

Create free account