1.02y - Partial fractions with linear factors
Split a complicated fraction into simple pieces, including repeated linear factors, and check the result by recombining. Then use the split with supplied expansion and integration rules to make longer problems manageable.
Splitting two distinct linear factors
Can making one fraction into several actually make a problem easier? Compare with . At , both give ; at , both give . The second form will make its power series almost immediate.
You already know
Adding fractions uses a common denominator. A polynomial identity holds at every real input; a fraction equation still excludes every zero of its denominator.
We are going to reverse that common-denominator calculation.
Partial fractions
A partial-fraction decomposition expresses a rational expression as a sum of simpler fractions with the same values on its domain. Distinct linear denominator factors each receive one constant numerator. For example, a denominator uses .
The constants are unknown until the numerator identity determines them.
Worked example 1: two monic factors
Question. Express in partial fractions.
Plan. Clear denominators and substitute the zeros of the factors into the resulting polynomial identity.
Why this step? Although the fractions are undefined at , the cleared polynomial identity holds there. We substitute into the identity, not into an undefined fraction.
Answer. , for .
Check. The recombined numerator is .
Change one feature: one factor has leading coefficient . Its zero and its multiplier must both be respected.
Worked example 2: a non-monic factor
Question. Express in partial fractions.
Plan. Keep the factors as written and use .
Why this step? Setting would not make zero; does.
Answer. , for .
Check. .
You can instead compare coefficients. In the last identity, and . Both routes give the same constants. The decomposition method is not in the formula sheet: learn it.
Watch out
Wrong: . Right: . If you rescale a denominator, rescale its numerator too.
Keep the non-monic factor but change the numerator.
Handling three distinct factors
Three distinct linear factors need three simple fractions. Clearing the denominator gives a quadratic identity even when the starting numerator is only constant or linear.
Worked example 3: a constant numerator
Question. Decompose .
Plan. Put constants over the three factors and isolate each in turn.
Why this step? At each chosen input two products vanish, leaving just one constant to find.
Answer. , with .
Check. . Both higher-power coefficients cancel.
Change one feature: make the numerator linear. The denominator and setup stay the same.
Worked example 4: a linear numerator
Question. Decompose .
Plan. Use the same identity with on its left.
Why this step? The new numerator changes the values substituted on the left; reusing the previous constants would give the wrong identity.
Answer. , for .
Check. .
Our denominator is no more complicated than three distinct linear factors or one linear factor times a squared linear factor. Numerators here are constant or linear, and the split uses no more than three terms. This setup is not in the formula sheet: learn it. An irreducible quadratic such as needs a different setup, beyond this lesson's scope.
Problem-solving
Check the recombined numerator, including coefficients that should be zero. With a constant starting numerator, all and terms must cancel.
Keep a linear numerator and change its constant.
Including every power of a repeated factor
A squared factor needs two available terms: one over its first power and one over its square. Without both, the numerator usually cannot be reconstructed.
A squared linear factor
For distinct factor zeros, the complete form is
where , and all denominator zeros remain excluded. Some solved coefficients may be zero.
Not in the formula sheet: learn it.
Use substitution for the constants it isolates, then compare a coefficient for the remaining one.
Worked example 5: a squared monic factor
Question. Decompose .
Plan. Include both powers of , clear the denominator and use the coefficient last.
Why this step? Substitution at the repeated zero removes both terms involving , so a different equation is needed for .
Answer. , for .
Check. .
Change one feature: replace the repeated monic factor by . Its zero is now .
Worked example 6: a squared non-monic factor
Question. Decompose .
Plan. Keep both powers of and compare the quadratic coefficient.
Why this step? Squaring makes its leading coefficient , which matters in the coefficient equation.
Answer. , with .
Check. .
Leaving out a possible term can accidentally work in a special case, but it is not a reliable general method. Set up every allowed power before finding the constants.
Watch out
Wrong: use only for a general denominator . Right: include too. Its coefficient may be non-zero.
Keep the non-monic repeated factor and change the numerator.
Using the split in a power series
Partial fractions let you expand one simple factor at a time. We supply the needed rules here; the series lesson develops them further.
General binomial expansion
For real and ,
For non-negative integer , the terminating expansion is valid for every real .
In the formula sheet.
Set and replace by . The useful cases, not printed separately on the sheet, are
A power series is an infinite sum of powers; writing terms through truncates it and is not an exact polynomial identity.
Worked example 7: two simple factors
Question. Find the expansion through of , using its split . State validity.
Plan. Expand each fraction separately and intersect their validity conditions.
Why this step? Both expansions must work together: and .
Answer. through , valid for .
Check. Multiplying the displayed terms by gives constant and zero coefficients of .
Change one feature: square the factor . Its coefficients change, but its zero and the strict validity bound do not.
Worked example 8: a repeated factor in a series
Question. Expand through , using
Plan. Use the squared-factor rule for the last term and collect powers.
Why this step? The squared rule contributes , not .
Answer. through , for .
Check. The split recombines because . Its denominator is ; the product with the displayed series has no or term.
The opening fractions really were easier to use separately. The striking coefficients are ; in fact its coefficient of is , directly from the two geometric expansions.
Watch out
Wrong: use the rational expression's whole domain as the series interval. Right: intersect the expansion conditions. A fraction may exist at an input where this power series does not converge.
Change the repeated factor's scale, using the supplied split.
Using the split in an integration step
An antiderivative differentiates back to the integrand. Splitting a fraction lets you apply familiar rules to each piece; we supply those rules here so the focus stays on using the decomposition.
Integration rules
For a differentiable function , on an interval where ,
and, for ,
Use real-valued powers on their domain.
In the formula sheet.
For , these give the following useful cases, not printed separately on the sheet. We supply them for this application:
Work on an interval not crossing .
The factor compensates for the derivative of . One arbitrary constant covers the sum on each allowed interval.
Worked example 9: integrate simple factors
Question. Integrate , given its split .
Plan. Apply the logarithm rule to each term, including its denominator coefficient.
Why this step? Differentiating introduces , so its coefficient must be .
Answer. , on an interval avoiding .
Check. Differentiating gives ; recombining gives numerator .
Change one feature: the second factor is squared. It now needs a reciprocal antiderivative as well as a logarithm.
Worked example 10: integrate a repeated factor
Question. Integrate , using the earlier split.
Plan. Integrate term by term.
Why this step? A squared denominator uses the reciprocal rule, not the logarithm rule.
Answer. , on an interval avoiding .
Check. The derivative of the last term is . The two logarithms give the other two fractions, already verified by recombination.
For comparison, the monic split from Worked example 1 gives
The absolute values allow either sign of each non-zero argument; an integral is taken on an interval without a denominator zero. Constants can differ on disconnected intervals.
Watch out
Wrong: integrate every denominator using a logarithm. Right: a first power produces a logarithm; a squared linear factor produces a reciprocal. Differentiate your answer to catch missing factors and signs.
Keep the repeated-factor split, with a new coefficient in the last term.
Quick Recap
- Distinct linear factors each need one constant-numerator fraction.
- A squared factor needs both its first and second powers; include all possible terms before solving.
- Clear denominators to obtain a polynomial identity, then substitute factor zeros or compare coefficients and recombine to check.
- A split makes expansions and integrals simpler; keep the correct series interval and integration domain.
Yes, several fractions can be easier than one: the opening split gives immediately, for .