13B.18-13B.22 - Gibbs Energy And Feasibility

13B.18-13B.22 - Gibbs Energy And Feasibility

Combine enthalpy, entropy and temperature to predict thermodynamic feasibility. Calculate a temperature boundary and an equilibrium constant, then distinguish a favourable equilibrium from a reaction that is fast enough to observe.

Enthalpy, Entropy And Temperature

Some reactions release heat and proceed readily, but enthalpy alone is not enough to decide feasibility. An endothermic process can be feasible if it gives a large enough increase in entropy, and an exothermic process can become less favourable at high temperature if it causes a large enough decrease in entropy.

Gibbs free energy is the quantity that combines those two effects:

Gibbs free energy change

ΔG=ΔH−TΔSsystem\Delta G = \Delta H - T\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}}

ΔH\Delta H and ΔG\Delta G in kJ mol−1\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}; TT in K; ΔSsystem\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}} in kJ K−1 mol−1\mathrm{kJ\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}} (divide J values by 1000). A reaction is feasible when ΔG<0\Delta G < 0.

The sign of ΔG\Delta G gives the thermodynamic prediction for the reaction as written under the stated conditions.

ΔG\Delta G signThermodynamic meaning
ΔG<0\Delta G < 0feasible as written
ΔG=0\Delta G = 0at the feasibility boundary, linked to equilibrium
ΔG>0\Delta G > 0not feasible as written under those conditions

The equation is closely related to total entropy. From the previous lesson, a feasible change has a positive total entropy change. Since the surroundings entropy term depends on the enthalpy change, Gibbs free energy packages the balance between system entropy and enthalpy into one value: negative ΔG\Delta G corresponds to the entropy balance favouring the reaction.

Common-error contrast: "feasible" does not mean "fast". Gibbs free energy tells you whether the final state is thermodynamically favoured; it does not tell you whether particles can get over the activation energy barrier quickly enough to observe the reaction.

Using the Gibbs Equation

Most errors in Gibbs calculations are unit errors. TT must be in kelvin, and ΔH\Delta H and TΔSsystemT \Delta S_{\mathrm{system}} must use the same energy unit before they are subtracted.

Two safe routes are possible:

RouteHow to handle units
kJ routeConvert ΔSsystem\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}} from J K−1 mol−1\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}} to kJ K−1 mol−1\mathrm{kJ\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}, then report ΔG\Delta G in kJ mol−1\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}
J routeConvert ΔH\Delta H from kJ mol−1\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}} to J mol−1\mathrm{J\,mol^{-1}}, then report ΔG\Delta G in J mol−1\mathrm{J\,mol^{-1}} or convert back to kJ mol−1\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}

Worked example: predict feasibility at 298 K.

A reaction has ΔH=+45.0 kJ mol−1\Delta H = +45.0\,\mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}, ΔSsystem=+160 J K−1 mol−1\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}} = +160\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}} and T=298 KT = 298\,\mathrm{K}.

Use the kJ route:

ΔSsystem=+160J K−1 mol−1=+0.160kJ K−1 mol−1\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}} = +160 \mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}} = +0.160 \mathrm{kJ\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}} ΔG=ΔH−TΔSsystem\Delta G = \Delta H - T \Delta S_{\mathrm{system}}

ΔG=+45.0−(298×0.160)\Delta G = +45.0 - (298\times 0.160)

ΔG=+45.0−47.7\Delta G = +45.0 - 47.7

ΔG=−2.7kJ mol−1\Delta G = -2.7 \mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}

The prediction is thermodynamically feasible at 298 K298\,\mathrm{K} because ΔG\Delta G is negative. The chemical interpretation matters: the enthalpy term is unfavourable because the reaction is endothermic, but the positive entropy term is large enough at this temperature to outweigh it.

Finding the Feasible Temperature

When a question asks for the temperature at which a reaction becomes feasible, set ΔG=0\Delta G = 0. That gives the boundary temperature:

[DIAGRAM: asset_name: Free energy against temperature for positive enthalpy and entropy; asset_slug: edexcel_a_level_chemistry_l063_gibbs_temperature; recommended_method: deterministic_chart; description: Free energy against temperature for positive enthalpy and entropy.]
Diagram

Feasibility boundary temperature

0=ΔH−TΔSsystem⇒T=ΔHΔSsystem0 = \Delta H - T\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}} \quad\Rightarrow\quad T = \frac{\Delta H}{\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}}}

ΔH\Delta H and ΔSsystem\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}} in matching units (kJ and kJ K⁻¹, or J and J K⁻¹); TT in K. Assumes ΔH\Delta H and ΔSsystem\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}} are roughly constant with temperature.

This calculation only makes sense when ΔH\Delta H and ΔSsystem\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}} are in matching units. The answer is in kelvin.

Worked example: determine the temperature boundary.

A decomposition has:

ΔH=+178kJ mol−1\Delta H = +178 \mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}

ΔSsystem=+161J K−1 mol−1\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}} = +161 \mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}

Convert entropy to kJ:

ΔSsystem=+0.161kJ K−1 mol−1\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}} = +0.161 \mathrm{kJ\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}

At the boundary:

T=ΔH/ΔSsystemT = \Delta H / \Delta S_{\mathrm{system}}

T=178/0.161T = 178 / 0.161

T=1106 KT = 1106\,\mathrm{K}

Because both ΔH\Delta H and ΔSsystem\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}} are positive, the reaction becomes feasible above this temperature. Below 1106 K1106\,\mathrm{K}, the TΔSsystemT \Delta S_{\mathrm{system}} term is too small to overcome the positive enthalpy change. Above 1106 K1106\,\mathrm{K}, the entropy contribution is large enough to make ΔG\Delta G negative.

The sign pattern is a useful sense check:

ΔH\Delta HΔSsystem\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}}Temperature effect
negativepositivefeasible at all positive temperatures in this simple test
positivenegativenot feasible at any positive temperature in this simple test
positivepositivefeasible above the boundary temperature
negativenegativefeasible below the boundary temperature

Guided practice: a reaction has:

ΔH=−92.0kJ mol−1\Delta H = -92.0 \mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}

ΔSsystem=−199J K−1 mol−1\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}} = -199 \mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}

Determine the temperature boundary and state whether the reaction is feasible above or below it.

Expected answer:

ΔSsystem=−0.199kJ K−1 mol−1\Delta S_{\mathrm{system}} = -0.199 \mathrm{kJ\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}

T=(−92.0)/(−0.199)T = (-92.0) / (-0.199)

T=462 KT = 462\,\mathrm{K}

The reaction is feasible below 462 K462\,\mathrm{K}. For example, at 298 K298\,\mathrm{K}, ΔG=−92.0−(298×−0.199)=−32.7kJ mol−1\Delta G = -92.0 - (298\times -0.199) = -32.7 \mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}, but at 600 K600\,\mathrm{K}, ΔG=−92.0−(600×−0.199)=+27.4kJ mol−1\Delta G = -92.0 - (600\times -0.199) = +27.4 \mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}.

Gibbs Energy and Equilibrium

The standard reaction Gibbs free energy, ΔG∘\Delta G^{\circ}, is linked to the dimensionless equilibrium constant KK. The specification often abbreviates this symbol to ΔG\Delta G in this relationship:

Gibbs energy and the equilibrium constant

ΔG∘=−RTln⁡K\Delta G^{\circ} = -RT\ln K

R=8.31 J K−1 mol−1R = 8.31\,\mathrm{J\,K^{-1}\,mol^{-1}}; TT in K; ΔG∘\Delta G^{\circ} in J mol−1\mathrm{J\,mol^{-1}} when RR is in joules; KK is the dimensionless equilibrium constant; ln⁡\ln is the natural logarithm.

The signs explain the chemistry:

Equilibrium constantln⁡K\ln KΔG∘=−RTln⁡K\Delta G^{\circ} = -RT\ln KInterpretation
K>1K > 1positivenegativeproducts are favoured; feasible as written
K=1K = 1zerozeroboundary case
0<K<10 < K < 1negativepositivereactants are favoured; not feasible as written

Worked example: show the link for a large equilibrium constant.

At 298 K298\,\mathrm{K}, a reaction has:

K=2.0×105K = 2.0\times 10^{5}

Calculate:

ln⁡K=ln⁡(2.0×105)=12.2\ln K = \ln(2.0\times 10^{5}) = 12.2

ΔG∘=−RTln⁡K\Delta G^{\circ} = -RT\ln K

ΔG∘=−(8.31)(298)(12.2)\Delta G^{\circ} = -(8.31)(298)(12.2)

ΔG∘=−3.02×104J mol−1\Delta G^{\circ} = -3.02\times 10^{4} \mathrm{J\,mol^{-1}}

Continue this lesson.

You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.

Create free account