F2, F7 - Exponential growth and decay models

F2, F7 - Exponential growth and decay models

Use F2 to connect an exponential's gradient to its current value. Apply that proportional-rate idea in F7 models of continuous interest, population growth and decay, then test assumptions and refine models with a nonzero baseline.

Exponential gradients and proportional rates

If a growing population doubles, must it take longer to double again because it now needs more new organisms?

Imagine that each organism contributes the same average net growth rate. A population twice as large then adds organisms twice as quickly. The absolute rate changes, even while the rate per organism stays constant.

You already know

For N=N0ektN=N_0e^{kt}, an interval of length ss multiplies the amount by ekse^{ks}. Taking ln⁡\ln solves for an unknown time. These index and logarithm results are not supplied in the formula booklet.

The special property of exe^x is that its gradient equals its current value. More generally the gradient of ekxe^{kx} is kekxke^{kx}. The notation dy/dxdy/dx means the instantaneous rate of change, or tangent gradient; use this exponential gradient result directly here. Later lessons develop differentiation methods and their derivations.

Exponential gradient and relative rate

For y=Aekxy=Ae^{kx},

dydx=Akekx=ky\frac{dy}{dx}=Ake^{kx}=ky

When y≠0y\ne0, the constant ratio 1ydydx=k\frac{1}{y}\frac{dy}{dx}=k is the relative rate. For positive yy, k>0k>0 gives growth and k<0k<0 gives decay.

Not in the formula booklet: learn it.

If time is in days, kk has units day−1\mathrm{day}^{-1}; its product with time is dimensionless. An absolute rate has units of amount per day. A continuous relative rate of 0.08 day−10.08\,\mathrm{day}^{-1} gives a one-day percentage increase 100(e0.08−1)%≈8.33%100(e^{0.08}-1)\%\approx8.33\%, rather than exactly 8%8\%. This conversion is a consequence of the unsupplied exponential model.

Growth and decay with equal relative-rate magnitudes give changing absolute gradients

The growth curve steepens as more is present. The decay rate is negative, but its magnitude gets smaller as less remains. Adding a constant amount each day would instead give a straight line.

Worked example 1: a population's rate and doubling time

Question. A population is modelled by N(t)=600e0.08tN(t)=600e^{0.08t}, with t≥0t\ge0 in days. Find its initial growth rate, its rate after 55 days, and its doubling time.

Plan. Multiply the population by its relative rate, then solve the equation for twice the starting amount.

dNdt=0.08N=48e0.08texponential gradientN′(0)=48N′(5)=48e0.4≈71.6rates in organisms per day600e0.08T=1200twice the starting amountT=ln⁡20.08≈8.66divide and take ln⁡\begin{aligned} \frac{dN}{dt}&=0.08N=48e^{0.08t} && \text{exponential gradient} \\ N'(0)&=48\qquad N'(5)=48e^{0.4}\approx71.6 && \text{rates in organisms per day} \\ 600e^{0.08T}&=1200 && \text{twice the starting amount} \\ T&=\frac{\ln2}{0.08}\approx8.66 && \text{divide and take }\ln \end{aligned}

Why this step? The amount 600600 cancels in the doubling equation, so the time depends on the relative rate, not the initial population.

Answer. Rates: initially 4848 and after 55 days approximately 71.671.6 organisms per day. Doubling time: approximately 8.668.66 days.

Check. e0.08T=2e^{0.08T}=2. Over any further interval of length TT, the same factor 22 applies again.

Change only the initial population to 12001200. This doubles each absolute rate, but the time to multiply the population by 22 should be unchanged.

Worked example 2: doubling the initial amount

Question. Repeat the rate and doubling-time calculations for N(t)=1200e0.08tN(t)=1200e^{0.08t}, with time in days.

Plan. Use the same relative-rate multiplier and set the target to twice the new starting amount.

dNdt=96e0.08t0.08×1200=96N′(0)=96N′(5)=96e0.4≈143substitute the times1200e0.08T=2400new doubling targetT=ln⁡20.08≈8.66same amount ratio\begin{aligned} \frac{dN}{dt}&=96e^{0.08t} && 0.08\times1200=96 \\ N'(0)&=96\qquad N'(5)=96e^{0.4}\approx143 && \text{substitute the times} \\ 1200e^{0.08T}&=2400 && \text{new doubling target} \\ T&=\frac{\ln2}{0.08}\approx8.66 && \text{same amount ratio} \end{aligned}

Why this step? Doubling both the amount and its growth rate leaves the time to achieve a fixed multiplying factor unchanged.

Answer. Rates: 9696 and approximately 143143 organisms per day, respectively. The doubling time remains approximately 8.668.66 days.

Check. Each unrounded rate is twice its value in example 1, while 2400/1200=1200/600=22400/1200=1200/600=2.

The gradient rule works for negative exponents too. For y=7e−2xy=7e^{-2x}, the gradient is −14e−2x-14e^{-2x}; at x=ln⁡2x=\ln2, it is −14/4=−7/2-14/4=-7/2. The negative gradient describes decrease, not a negative amount.

Watch out

Wrong: “The rate of 600e0.08t600e^{0.08t} is 0.080.08 organisms per day.” The 0.080.08 is a relative rate in day−1\mathrm{day}^{-1}. Multiply by the current population: the absolute rate is 48e0.08t48e^{0.08t} organisms per day.

Change only the initial population again. Use the rate's units to distinguish it from an amount.

Continuous compound interest

Continuous compounding models a balance increasing at a rate proportional to the balance at every instant.

For a nominal annual rate rr, compounding nn times per year gives P0(1+r/n)ntP_0(1+r/n)^{nt} after tt years. Increasing nn makes each interest addition smaller but more frequent; its limiting balance is P0ertP_0e^{rt}. Neither of these compounding formulae is supplied in the formula booklet.

Continuous compound interest

P(t)=P0ert,t≥0P(t)=P_0e^{rt},\qquad t\ge0

Here P0P_0 is the initial balance, rr the continuous annual rate as a decimal, and tt time in years. Assume constant rr and no deposits, withdrawals or fees.

The one-year multiplier is b=erb=e^r, so the effective annual percentage increase is 100(er−1)%100(e^r-1)\%. Conversely, r=ln⁡br=\ln b.

Not in the formula booklet: learn it.

A continuous rate of 4.5%4.5\% means r=0.045 year−1r=0.045\,\mathrm{year}^{-1}; the effective annual increase is about 4.60%4.60\%. Use the same time units as the rate, and retain the exact rate until the final monetary rounding.

Worked example 3: a balance and a target time

Question. An initial £2500 earns continuous interest at rate 0.045 year−10.045\,\mathrm{year}^{-1}, with no other transactions. Find the balance after 66 years to the nearest penny, and the time to reach £3500 to two decimal places.

Plan. Substitute the given time, then solve a separate exponential equation for the target balance.

P(6)=2500e0.045(6)≈3274.91balance in pounds2500e0.045t=3500target balancee0.045t=1.4divide by 2500t=ln⁡1.40.045≈7.48take ln⁡ and divide\begin{aligned} P(6)&=2500e^{0.045(6)}\approx3274.91 && \text{balance in pounds} \\ 2500e^{0.045t}&=3500 && \text{target balance} \\ e^{0.045t}&=1.4 && \text{divide by }2500 \\ t&=\frac{\ln1.4}{0.045}\approx7.48 && \text{take }\ln\text{ and divide} \end{aligned}

Why this step? Divide by the original deposit before taking logarithms; the target is an amount ratio, not an amount to add to the exponent.

Answer. The balance is £3274.91, including £774.91 interest. The target is reached after approximately 7.487.48 years.

Check. 2500eln⁡1.4=35002500e^{\ln1.4}=3500; the target exceeds the six-year balance, and the target time exceeds 66.

Change only the target from £3500 to £4000. The account's model stays fixed, so compare the new time with the first target time.

Worked example 4: a higher target

Question. For the same initial £2500 and continuous rate 0.045 year−10.045\,\mathrm{year}^{-1}, find the time to reach £4000 to two decimal places.

Plan. Form the new balance ratio, then solve its logarithmic equation.

2500e0.045t=4000new targete0.045t=1.6divide by initial balance0.045t=ln⁡1.6inverse functionst=ln⁡1.60.045≈10.44solve for time\begin{aligned} 2500e^{0.045t}&=4000 && \text{new target} \\ e^{0.045t}&=1.6 && \text{divide by initial balance} \\ 0.045t&=\ln1.6 && \text{inverse functions} \\ t&=\frac{\ln1.6}{0.045}\approx10.44 && \text{solve for time} \end{aligned}

Why this step? A target expressed as a multiplying factor fits the exponential model directly; adding a fixed amount each year would describe a different model.

Answer. Approximately 10.4410.44 years.

Check. 2500eln⁡1.6=40002500e^{\ln1.6}=4000. The higher target takes longer than 7.487.48 years, as it should.

These are continuous times. Rounding up to the next integer would answer a different question about the first whole-year anniversary. For comparison, a £1800 deposit at 0.03 year−10.03\,\mathrm{year}^{-1} has balance 1800e0.12≈£2029.491800e^{0.12}\approx\text{£}2029.49 after 44 years.

Watch out

Wrong: P(6)=2500e4.5(6)P(6)=2500e^{4.5(6)}. A percentage must be converted to a decimal: 4.5%=0.0454.5\%=0.045, so the exponent is 0.045(6)=0.270.045(6)=0.27.

Change only the target again and preserve the unrounded logarithm until the end.

Decay constants and half-life

Exponential decay removes a fixed fraction over equal time intervals, so its modelled amount stays positive at every finite time.

A model Q=Q0e−λtQ=Q_0e^{-\lambda t} uses a positive decay constant λ\lambda. The rate is −λQ-\lambda Q: the minus sign describes decrease. The half-life HH is the time for the amount to halve. To obtain its formula, divide Q0e−λH=Q0/2Q_0e^{-\lambda H}=Q_0/2 by Q0Q_0, then take ln⁡\ln: −λH=−ln⁡2-\lambda H=-\ln2.

Continue this lesson.

You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.

Create free account