4.1(a), 4.1(c)–(e); 4.2(a)–(b) - Geographical evidence, maps and GIS

4.1(a), 4.1(c)–(e); 4.2(a)–(b) - Geographical evidence, maps and GIS

Geographical evidence connects information to locations, places and spatial relationships. This lesson develops the geographical-information skills in 4.1 and the geolocated-data skills in 4.2 through coastal and urban examples, showing how maps and GIS can answer questions while also creating misleading impressions.

What makes evidence geographical

Information becomes geographical when its location and relationships to other locations help answer a question. A beach-pebble diameter is a measurement; a diameter recorded at a stated position along a sediment cell can help investigate sorting during transport. Location alone is not an explanation: a geographer asks why a pattern occurs, at what scale, and whether different processes could produce it.

Geographical information

Information about the characteristics, locations and spatial relationships of people, places or environments.

Two different distinctions describe evidence. Quantitative information records amounts, counts or numerical measurements, such as a settlement's population or channel width. Qualitative information records meanings, experiences or qualities, such as a resident's account of belonging. A coded interview can produce counts, but those counts do not preserve every meaning in the original account. Neither numerical appearance nor a detailed quotation guarantees accuracy.

Primary and secondary describe a relationship to the investigation. Researchers commonly call information they collect themselves primary and evidence produced for another purpose secondary. OCR's investigation definition also recognises unmanipulated raw datasets as primary data. Therefore explain the evidence's actual provenance rather than assuming that everything downloaded is secondary. An edited published interpretation and its underlying untouched observations are different information products.

Evidence may be numerical without being spatial, or both: a table of noise readings becomes spatial when readings have coordinates. Digital photographs contain visual evidence; maps show selected spatial relationships; diagrams simplify processes; graphs emphasise distributions and change. Factual reports and creative sources such as poems can both reveal place, but they support different claims. A poem may illuminate an experience of exclusion without estimating how many residents share it.

Reading maps at different scales

A map selects and generalises features of the Earth, so its scale, symbols and date determine what questions it can answer. A large-scale map shows a smaller area in greater detail.

Worked map distances

On an original 1:25 0001:25\,000 map, a 4-centimetre straight line represents:

d=4×25,000=100,000 cm;d=100,000/100,000=1 km.d=4\times25{,}000=100{,}000\text{ cm};\qquad d=100{,}000/100{,}000=1\text{ km}.

On a separate 1:50 0001:50\,000 map, a 3.6-centimetre route segment represents:

d=3.6×50,000=180,000 cm;d=180,000/100,000=1.8 km.d=3.6\times50{,}000=180{,}000\text{ cm};\qquad d=180{,}000/100{,}000=1.8\text{ km}.

Follow a curved route in short measured segments rather than using its endpoint distance. Screen zoom changes displayed size, so use the current scale bar rather than a remembered paper measurement.

Read coordinates in the stated coordinate system. On a British National Grid map, eastings are read before northings; six-figure grid references refine a location within a kilometre square. Latitude and longitude instead express angular position. Do not overlay two datasets merely because both have two columns of coordinates: their reference systems and units must be compatible.

Contours join equal elevations. Closely spaced contours normally indicate a steep slope, but compare the contour interval and map scale first. A sequence of contour values is needed to distinguish rising ground from a depression. These observations help explain drainage routes and the exposure of settlements, rather than proving a hazard occurred.

Worked population densities

Illustrative areas: A contains 200 residents in 1 km21\,\mathrm{km^2}; B contains 300 in 3 km23\,\mathrm{km^2}. Divide population by area before comparing:

DA=200/1=200;DB=300/3=100 people per km2.D_A=200/1=200;\qquad D_B=300/3=100\text{ people per km}^2.

B has more people but lower density. In a second comparison, C has 850 residents in half a square kilometre and D has 2400 in two square kilometres:

DC=850/0.5=1700;DD=2400/2=1200 people per km2.D_C=850/0.5=1700;\qquad D_D=2400/2=1200\text{ people per km}^2.

The larger total again does not identify the denser area. A choropleth shades whole areas and usually needs a rate, proportion or density when areas differ in size. A shaded ward does not show every household's circumstances. ONS's choropleth guidance explains this choice; its Census maps guidance, updated May 2023, warns that displayed statistics describe an area rather than the building beneath a label.

Continue this lesson.

You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.

Create free account