Appendix 2 1, 2; 9GE0/04 - Developing an independent geographical enquiry
Learn how to turn geographical curiosity into a manageable enquiry, use literature to establish its context, and preserve your independence when planning an investigation.
Fieldwork and the individual investigation
Fieldwork connects geographical ideas to evidence observed outside the classroom, while the independent investigation asks you to make and justify your own decisions about a geographical question.
The A-level course requires at least four days of fieldwork, outside the classroom and school grounds, relating to processes in both physical and human geography and developing the skills in Appendix 2. Your centre records the fieldwork and submits its fieldwork statement. Reading lessons or completing written exercises cannot establish that these days have happened.
Your independent investigation, component 9GE0/04, may focus on physical geography, human geography, or a combination. It must connect to compulsory or optional specification content. You define and develop its question individually, incorporate field data or evidence, and draw on your own research. Primary field data may be collected individually or as part of an authorised group. Relevant secondary data must be selected by you. You may use data from the course fieldwork or collect new data for a separate enquiry: the four-day course requirement and the investigation are related, but are not the same requirement.
Primary and secondary data
Primary data are collected first-hand for the enquiry, such as your measurements or observations. Secondary data were originally collected or produced by someone else, such as a published dataset, map or report.
Pearson recommends a report of 3,000–4,000 words. This is guidance rather than an automatic length penalty, but a very short or long report can make it harder to demonstrate focused investigation skills. The assessed investigation has 70 marks, awarded by the centre and moderated by Pearson. Its criteria cover purpose; field methodologies and collection; representation, analysis and evaluation of techniques; and conclusions and overall critical evaluation. The small point rubrics in these lessons are formative learning checks, separate from that assessment.
All named sites, observations and candidate situations used as worked illustrations here are fictional training material. They show reasoning, not evidence for your own investigation. Your actual record must describe work and data that really exist; neither these exercises nor a digital tutor authenticate your fieldwork or submission.
A question that evidence can answer
A useful enquiry identifies a geographical relationship or process, a location and a scale that your evidence can address.
An aim states the overall purpose. A research question states what you want to find out. A hypothesis predicts a relationship that evidence could support or challenge. An enquiry need not force a directional hypothesis onto an exploratory study of meanings or experiences. Sub-questions divide the enquiry into connected issues; unrelated sub-questions create several small projects without a clear purpose.
For critique only, consider the fictional aim “Find out everything about change in Merebridge.” It has no defined area, time period or meaning of change. A bounded training question might ask how pedestrian activity differs between two specified street zones during stated observation periods. This turns an abstract theme into observable evidence. It still needs an explanation of why that difference matters geographically, for example the relationship between land use, accessibility and patterns of movement. Do not adopt a worked title as your NEA title: generate and justify your own focus from your interests, reading and actual opportunities.
Operationalisation
Turning a concept into clearly defined observations or measurements. For example, pedestrian activity might be recorded as people crossing a defined counting line per ten-minute interval.
“Quality of place” could mean environmental conditions, accessibility or people's attachment. A litter count measures one environmental feature; it does not directly measure belonging. State your indicators and why they fit the concept. Identify the unit of observation too: one person, one street segment or one measurement site. This helps you avoid comparing unlike evidence.
A predicted relationship is not proof of its cause. If busy streets have more litter, footfall might contribute, but bin availability, collection times or land use could also matter. Plan evidence that helps distinguish these explanations and frame the eventual claim at the scale the evidence supports.
Literature and geographical context
Reading establishes the ideas and comparisons your field observations will test, refine or challenge.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account