8.1.5 - Anti-drug campaign strategies
FRANK provides a concrete example of how a drug campaign tries to change knowledge, expectations and decisions. This lesson explains its audience and communication methods, the psychology behind them, and the evidence needed to judge effectiveness.
FRANK’s purpose and audience
A campaign can discourage drug use by changing the information and support available before a person makes a decision.
FRANK, launched in 2003, is the UK national drug-information campaign and advice service chosen for this course. Its prevention aim is to help young people understand effects and harms and develop confidence to reject drugs. Parents, carers and professionals working with young people are also audiences: a better-informed parent may have a more useful conversation, while a teacher can direct a pupil to accurate information. FRANK also supports people already concerned about drug use; prevention and access to help are related but different outcomes.
An official 2011 advertising phase targeted 11–18-year-olds through youth radio and websites. The adverts asked drug-related questions and directed teenagers to FRANK to reconsider what they knew. This makes the campaign more specific than a general instruction to “say no”: it offers a recognisable place to check information. Historical advertising phases should not be mistaken for the complete current service.
The current website has a drug A–Z and help pages for concerns about friends, children and pressure to take drugs. Telephone, text and email contact offer confidential advice. “Confidential” should not be casually rewritten as “untraceable”: FRANK explains that calls may appear on a bill and ordinary call/text charges may apply. Accessible contact and a non-judgemental tone matter because embarrassment can prevent someone asking for help. FRANK’s contact information describes the actual service; the Home Office campaign account records the 2011 phase.
Risk beliefs and social images
FRANK’s messages can be understood by asking which beliefs make drug taking seem attractive or safe.
The government’s 2017 evaluation described FRANK as originally based on the prototype/willingness model, drawing on health-belief and social-norm approaches, with later emphasis on personal vulnerability and behavioural intentions. A prototype is an image of a typical person who performs a behaviour. If a teenager imagines a drug user as popular and carefree, willingness to take a drug in a social situation may increase without a carefully planned intention. Challenging that image and assumptions about what peers do could reduce this willingness. A friendship group is not evidence that everyone of the same age takes drugs.
In a health-belief interpretation, a message makes a possible harm seem serious and personally relevant. Someone who knows a harm exists may still think “that only happens to other people”. Specific factual information can challenge this perceived immunity. However, perceived costs and barriers also matter: refusing might seem socially awkward, while asking an adult might seem embarrassing. Advice on responding to pressure and confidential support offer ways to act on the information.
These are mechanisms through which communication might work, not proof that it did work. Telling people about severe consequences alone may provoke disbelief, avoidance or defensiveness. A credible account of risk and an achievable protective action give the recipient both a reason and a means to change. The government evaluation, chapter 4 identifies the campaign’s theoretical basis.
Behavioural intention
A decision or plan to perform a behaviour. It differs from willingness to respond to an opportunity, and neither guarantees subsequent action.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account