H567/03 Section B Option 3 - Recycling and conservation behaviour
Explain conservation and recycling behaviour through beliefs, social influence and practical control, while distinguishing favourable attitudes from actions.
Conservation actions and measurement
Conservation behaviour helps preserve resources or reduce environmental damage. It includes reducing unnecessary energy or water use, repairing and reusing goods, choosing less wasteful consumption and sorting materials for recycling. Recycling involves collecting and processing materials so they can be used again. It differs from reusing the same container and from avoiding the purchase in the first place. More items placed in a recycling bin do not necessarily mean less total waste has been produced.
The precise action matters. Turning off an unused light, using a refillable bottle and correctly sorting accepted packaging have different costs, opportunities and routines. A broad statement that someone “cares about the environment” does not show which of these they do. Measures should identify the action, setting and time period.
For recycling, distinguish reported intention, self-reported behaviour and observed correctly sorted material. Self-reports are economical but can be influenced by memory and a desire to appear responsible. Observed bin contents are closer to the action, but counts do not directly measure mass, correct processing, avoided waste or long-term conservation. Contaminating a recycling collection can reduce its usefulness even when someone sincerely intended to help.
In an original example, a school replaces disposable cups with washable cups. Measuring the reduction in disposable cups bought addresses waste prevention; counting bottles in a recycling bin addresses a different action. Selecting a relevant measure prevents a positive attitude score being treated as proof of environmental benefit.
Attitudes, norms and perceived control
Ajzen's theory of planned behaviour helps organise influences on intention. An attitude towards a behaviour is the person's evaluation of doing that particular action: separating household glass may seem useful, inconvenient or both. A subjective norm is perceived social pressure about the action, such as believing that people whose opinions matter expect careful sorting. Perceived behavioural control concerns how easy or difficult the person thinks performing it will be.
These influences can contribute to an intention, which can then guide behaviour. Their relative importance varies with behaviour and setting; the model does not say that all three must be equally strong. Beliefs about consequences, others' expectations and obstacles help underlie these judgements. Perceived control is not the same as a general confident personality.
For example, Noah thinks saving water benefits the community, believes his housemates expect it, and knows how to operate a low-flow fitting. This can support an intention to use less water. If the landlord refuses permission to alter the plumbing, actual control still limits the action. Intention is therefore informative but does not guarantee behaviour.
The cognitive area explains evaluation and anticipated consequences. The social area explains perceived expectations, and a behavioural perspective asks how feedback or rewarding consequences sustain a routine. These accounts can complement one another. A campaign that only changes beliefs may achieve little if opportunities remain unavailable, while equipment alone may not be used if its purpose is misunderstood.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account