3.6.3 - Human resource planning and flow
Human resource planning identifies the people and skills a business will need and how it will obtain them. This lesson explains recruitment, training, redeployment and redundancy as connected decisions, with attention to timing, costs and the effects on employees and other functions.
Planning employee numbers, skills and location
A human resource plan compares the workforce a business expects to need with the workforce it expects to have.
Illustrative case: a distribution business is planning the workforce for a second warehouse. It forecasts order volume, the working hours and skills required, and where employees need to work. It then considers current employees, likely departures, recruitment lead times and whether equipment will change the labour requirement. A target of twenty warehouse employees is incomplete if none can operate the necessary equipment or the workers are based too far away.
Human resource flow concerns people entering, developing, moving within and leaving the organisation. A plan may combine recruiting new staff, training current employees, redeploying people and managing reductions. These methods should support objectives such as service capacity, talent development, engagement and cost control.
Forecasts are uncertain. A business may overestimate demand and recruit more staff than it can use, or underestimate demand and struggle to fulfil orders. Changing technology can alter the required skills after a plan is prepared. Managers should update the plan and compare plausible demand scenarios rather than assume one forecast is certain.
Timing is crucial. Recruitment and training must be completed before the new operation needs the employees. A staffing plan should therefore coordinate with operations' opening schedule and finance's budget. A realistic plan also investigates whether the local labour market can supply the required skills.
Microsoft reported approximately 228,000 full-time employees at 30 June 2025, including 80,000 in product research and development and 89,000 in operations. These different categories show why a workforce plan needs a skill mix as well as a total. Expanding datacentres calls for operational capability; transferring a research employee into that work may require training rather than simply moving one headcount. Microsoft, 2025.
Recruitment and training choices
Recruitment brings people into roles, while training develops the knowledge and skills needed to perform work.
Recruiting internally draws candidates from current employees. It can offer progression, use known performance information and reduce some induction needs. However, it may create another vacancy and limits the pool of new experience. External recruitment can bring skills or perspectives not currently available, but identifying suitable candidates takes time and the employer has less direct evidence of their performance in its own setting.
The process should start from the work and skills required. Software support requires employees to combine technical knowledge with clear communication with customers. Selecting solely on a technical certificate may miss an essential service capability. Fair, relevant selection helps the business obtain suitable people and avoid excluding capable applicants.
Induction familiarises recruits with the organisation, procedures and responsibilities. On-the-job training develops skills while working, potentially using the actual equipment and tasks. It can be immediately relevant but requires capable supervision and may disrupt output. Off-the-job training gives time and specialist facilities away from normal duties, but incurs costs and must transfer effectively back to the workplace.
Training current staff can be preferable where the organisation needs to retain experience and develop a new skill. Recruiting an experienced specialist may be faster when internal learning would take too long. Neither route eliminates the need for support. A specialist still needs to understand the organisation's processes, and a trained employee needs opportunities to apply the skill.
Evaluate training through relevant changes in capability and performance, not attendance alone. Fewer errors, better customer resolution or safe use of new equipment may be meaningful outcomes. A change in results could also reflect equipment or demand, so managers should avoid attributing every improvement to the course.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account