8, key topic 5 - Dismantling Apartheid, 1990–94
Between 1990 and 1994 South Africa moved from legal apartheid and white minority rule to a multiracial democratic election. This was not a simple story of one leader deciding to be kind. It was a negotiated transition caused by pressure, political calculation, mass resistance, economic strain, international isolation, leadership, compromise, and fear that the alternative could be civil war.
The key skill is to link reform to consequence. De Klerk's reforms opened the political space. Mandela and the ANC used that space to turn liberation politics into negotiation. Other negotiators and political leaders then had to keep a fragile process alive long enough for the 1994 election.
| Date | Development | Why it mattered |
|---|---|---|
| 2 February 1990 | F.W. de Klerk announced the unbanning of the ANC, PAC and SACP and the release of political prisoners | The government accepted that banned opponents had to become negotiating partners. |
| 11 February 1990 | Nelson Mandela was released from Victor Verster Prison | The most famous anti-apartheid prisoner could lead openly inside South Africa. |
| 1990 | Groote Schuur and Pretoria Minutes | Government and ANC began setting conditions for formal talks; the ANC suspended armed activity. |
| 17 June 1991 | Parliament approved repeal of Population Registration | Classification repeal commenced on 28 June; key land and Group Areas laws were also repealed in 1991. Separate Amenities repeal had already commenced on 15 October 1990. |
| December 1991-May 1992 | CODESA I and II | Multiracial talks began but then deadlocked over power-sharing and constitutional control. |
| 17 March 1992 | White-only referendum supported de Klerk's reform process | De Klerk defeated right-wing white opposition and strengthened his mandate to negotiate. |
| 26 September 1992 | Record of Understanding | Government and ANC restarted the process after deadlock and violence. |
| 1993 | Multi-Party Negotiating Forum and Interim Constitution | The machinery for democratic elections and temporary power-sharing was agreed. |
| 26-29 April 1994 | First democratic elections | The ANC won a majority and apartheid rule formally ended. |
Why De Klerk Reformed
F.W. de Klerk became State President in 1989 after P.W. Botha's harder approach had failed to restore stability. By then apartheid was under pressure from several directions at once. Inside South Africa, township resistance, trade union action, civil society protest and the cost of security crackdowns showed that the state could not simply arrest its way back to order. Outside South Africa, sanctions, disinvestment, sporting and cultural isolation, and diplomatic criticism damaged the economy and the government's legitimacy.
The changing international situation also mattered. During the Cold War, the apartheid government had tried to present itself as a useful anti-communist ally. By 1989-90, the collapse of communist regimes in Eastern Europe weakened that argument. It also made it harder for white voters to believe that any negotiation with the ANC would automatically mean a Soviet-style revolution.
De Klerk's reforms were therefore both bold and calculated. On 2 February 1990 he announced that banned liberation movements, including the ANC, PAC and SACP, would be legal again. He also announced the release of political prisoners. Nelson Mandela walked free on 11 February 1990 after 27 years in prison.
The opening did not mean de Klerk had already accepted full majority rule in the form that later emerged. He hoped to manage the process, protect white interests, and negotiate a new system rather than lose control through revolution or civil war. That is why his reforms were significant: they transformed the ANC from a banned enemy into a legal political opponent, but they also began a contest over what the new South Africa would actually look like.
Misconception check: "de Klerk ended apartheid" is too simple. De Klerk's choices were vital, but they were made under pressure and they only began the dismantling process. The end of apartheid required negotiation, repeal of laws, mass political organisation, compromise and elections.
Repealing Apartheid's Legal Framework
De Klerk's first reforms changed political conditions. The 1991 repeal of apartheid laws changed the legal structure. Parliament approved Population Registration repeal on 17 June 1991, and the repeal Act commenced on 28 June. Major racial land and Group Areas controls were also repealed in 1991. The separate public-amenities legislation had already been repealed with effect from 15 October 1990; it must not be dated to 1991. The Population Registration Act had classified people by race. This mattered because racial classification had underpinned many other apartheid controls.
The consequences were important.
| Repeal changed... | Why it mattered |
|---|---|
| Legal classification by race | The state was removing the official categories that made apartheid administration possible. |
| Race-based land and residential controls | The legal basis for group-area segregation and racial land restriction was weakened. |
| Separate public amenities, repealed in 1990 | This earlier reform removed legal powers for everyday public-facility segregation; it was not a 1991 repeal. |
| Negotiating credibility | The government could claim it was not merely promising reform but actually dismantling apartheid law. |
However, repeal did not instantly create equality. It did not by itself give every adult the vote. It did not undo decades of forced removals, poverty, unequal education or political violence. It also did not settle who would write the new constitution. That is why the 1991 repeal is best understood as a necessary step, not the whole end of apartheid.
For an 8-mark effects question, avoid writing only "apartheid laws were repealed." Explain the mechanism:
The repeal of the Population Registration Act weakened apartheid because racial classification had been the administrative basis for many other controls. If the state could no longer legally classify every citizen into racial groups in the same way, the wider system of race-based rights, residence and political exclusion became harder to maintain.
Mandela, ANC And Negotiation
Mandela's release changed the political balance because he could connect three things: the ANC's liberation struggle, the mass support of Black South Africans and international sympathy. He was not simply a symbol. After release he quickly became central to formal negotiations and, in 1991, became ANC President after Oliver Tambo stepped down because of ill health.
The ANC also had difficult choices. It had to show that it could negotiate seriously without appearing to abandon the struggle. It wanted one-person-one-vote democracy, the return of exiles, the release of political prisoners and an end to repression. At the same time, many supporters were angry after decades of violence and exclusion, so ANC leaders had to persuade their own side that compromise was not surrender.
The early "talks about talks" helped create conditions for wider negotiation. The Groote Schuur Minute in May 1990 and the Pretoria Minute in August 1990 dealt with issues such as political prisoners, exiles and violence. The ANC's suspension of armed activity was especially significant because it reassured some opponents that negotiation could replace armed conflict, while giving the ANC a stronger claim to be working towards a peaceful settlement.
Political violence still threatened the process. Violence between ANC and IFP supporters, allegations of a "third force", and right-wing opposition all made trust difficult. When Chris Hani, a popular ANC and SACP leader, was assassinated in April 1993, South Africa came close to wider unrest. Mandela's public appeal for calm showed why his leadership mattered: he had enough authority with ANC supporters to restrain anger, while also appearing presidential to many people outside the ANC.
The ANC's role was therefore not just to oppose apartheid. Between 1990 and 1994 it had to become a legal national party, negotiate constitutional change, manage its supporters, and prepare to win power through an election.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account