4.2.6 - Globalisation - Cultural, Political and Economic
This lesson explains what sociologists mean by globalisation, how economic, political, and cultural links connect societies, and why sociologists disagree so sharply about its effects. For the exam, the key is to separate the three dimensions clearly, use the right thinkers for each debate, and then judge whether globalisation produces development, domination, or a mixture of both.
Defining globalisation
Globalisation is the process by which societies become more interconnected across long distances. In sociology, this means that decisions made in one place increasingly shape work, culture, politics, and identity somewhere else. Globalisation is therefore not just "more international contact". It is a change in the scale and speed of social relationships.
Globalisation
The increasing interconnectedness of societies through economic, political, and cultural relationships that stretch across national borders.
Anthony Giddens (1990) argued that globalisation intensifies worldwide social relations so that local events are shaped by distant happenings and vice versa. David Held et al. (1999) described it as the widening, deepening, and speeding up of worldwide interconnectedness. Both definitions matter because they show that globalisation is about social relationships, not simply geography. A factory closure in one country, a viral media trend in another, or a change to international lending rules can all reshape everyday life elsewhere.
The three dimensions of globalisation overlap. Economic globalisation links societies through trade, finance, and production. Political globalisation links them through international organisations, treaties, and norms. Cultural globalisation links them through media, brands, values, lifestyles, and identities. Information and communication technologies, especially the internet and mobile communication, accelerate all three because they make coordination, investment, and cultural exchange much faster.
Held's typology is useful because it shows that sociologists do not agree on what globalisation actually does.
| Perspective | Main claim | View of the nation state | Main limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperglobalist | Globalisation is real and transformative | State power is weakened by global markets and institutions | Can overstate how similar societies are becoming |
| Sceptic | Globalisation is exaggerated | States and regional blocs still matter greatly | Can underplay genuine new interdependence |
| Transformationalist | Globalisation is real but uneven and complex | States are reshaped rather than simply destroyed | Can seem broad rather than sharply predictive |
Hyperglobalists see a world moving toward tighter integration. Sceptics argue that there is still no single global society and that powerful states remain decisive. Paul Hirst and Grahame Thompson are associated with the sceptical view that the world economy is more international than fully global. Transformationalists take a middle position: globalisation is powerful, but it produces uneven outcomes and does not affect every society in the same way.
Economic and political links
Economic globalisation refers to the growing integration of markets, production, and finance across borders. This includes free trade, the movement of capital, and the expansion of global supply chains. Products are often designed in one country, assembled in another, and sold worldwide. This means national economies become harder to understand in isolation because employment, prices, and investment depend increasingly on international decisions.
Transnational corporation (TNC)
A company that operates across more than one country and organises production, investment, or sales on a global scale.
TNCs are central to this process because they can move production to locations with cheaper labour, weaker regulation, or better infrastructure. This can create jobs and investment, but it also gives large firms significant bargaining power over governments and workers. Economic globalisation therefore has a class dimension: owners, investors, and highly skilled professionals often gain more than workers in insecure or low-paid sectors. It also has a stratification dimension because some regions become highly connected to global circuits of capital while others remain marginal.
The growth of a weightless economy strengthens this trend. Services, finance, software, branding, and intellectual property can be moved and coordinated globally more easily than heavy industry. ICTs make that possible by allowing instant communication, online transactions, remote management, and the rapid movement of information. In this sense, technology does not replace capitalism; it makes global capitalism faster and more flexible.
Political globalisation refers to the rise of international governance structures such as the UN, WTO, IMF, and EU. These bodies shape the context in which national governments act. Trade rules, loan conditions, human rights norms, and climate agreements can all influence policy. Hyperglobalists interpret this as evidence that sovereignty has been eroded. Sceptics reply that powerful states still dominate these institutions and often shape the rules in their own interests.
Imagine a government trying to protect a local industry by raising trade barriers. It may face pressure from trading partners, investors, or organisations such as the WTO. At the same time, a TNC may threaten to relocate production elsewhere, showing how economic and political globalisation can limit the room national governments have to act independently.
This does not mean the nation state has vanished. States still control borders, taxation, welfare, law, and coercion. However, their choices are increasingly made within a global web of agreements, markets, and institutions. A transformationalist view fits this best: state power still exists, but it is exercised in a new and more constrained setting.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account