4.2.4 - Poverty, Wealth and Income Between Social Groups
This lesson explains how poverty, wealth and income are distributed across different social groups, why sociologists think those patterns exist, and how researchers measure them. For exams, the key move is to go beyond listing inequalities and show how class, gender, ethnicity, age, disability and state policy shape life chances.
Mapping wealth and income
Sociologists begin by separating income from wealth. Income is a flow of money coming in over time, such as wages, benefits, pensions, dividends or rent. Wealth is a stock of assets already owned, such as housing, savings, shares, land or pension rights. This distinction matters because two households can have similar incomes but very different levels of security, power and life chances if one owns substantial assets and the other does not.
Wealth
The stock of assets a person or household owns, such as property, savings, shares and pension wealth.
ONS survey estimates for Great Britain, April 2020–March 2022, show the wealthiest 1% of households held 10% of total household wealth, the same share as the least wealthy 50%. The wealth Gini coefficient was 0.59, compared with 0.36 for disposable income in financial year ending 2022. These dated estimates illustrate that assets were more concentrated than income; they are not timeless current figures. Survey coverage and reporting also limit precision. ONS wealth estimates.
Gini coefficient
A summary measure of inequality running from 0, meaning complete equality, to 1, meaning complete inequality. The higher the score, the more unevenly the measured resource, such as income or wealth, is distributed.
Why does wealth usually matter more for long-term inequality? Assets can be inherited, rise in value and generate more income. A paid-off house reduces housing costs; savings produce interest; shares generate dividends; pensions create security in later life. This is why sociologists treat wealth as a source of power, not just comfort.
Two households might each bring in similar monthly wages, but if one lives in an inherited mortgage-free home and has savings, that household has much greater security than a renting household with debts. The second household may look similar on income alone while facing much worse life chances.
Class, capital and policy
For Karl Marx, the deepest reason inequality persists is that capitalism separates those who own productive assets from those who must sell their labour. Owners receive profits, rent and capital gains, while workers depend mainly on wages. That means class inequality is built into the structure of capitalism rather than simply created by individual effort or failure.
Thomas Piketty (2014) — Argued that when the rate of return on capital is higher than the rate of economic growth, wealth owners pull further ahead over time. His comparison, , means the rate of return on capital exceeds the rate of economic growth. Under those conditions, retained returns and inheritance can concentrate wealth; it is not a rule that every asset always grows faster than wages.
This helps explain why income inequality rose sharply from the 1980s. Neoliberal policies, including weaker trade unions, deregulation, privatisation and tax changes favourable to high earners and asset owners, increased the rewards going to those at the top. At the same time, deindustrialisation and the expansion of low-paid service work produced more insecure jobs at the bottom.
In-work poverty
Poverty experienced by people who are in employment but whose wages are too low, insecure or irregular to provide an adequate living standard.
In-work poverty is sociologically important because it challenges the idea that employment automatically solves poverty. A person can be working and still be poor if pay is low, rents are high, hours are unstable or benefits have been reduced. This is one reason sociologists treat poverty as a structural issue linked to labour markets, housing and welfare policy.
Max Weber — Accepted that class matters, but argued that inequality is also shaped by market situation, status and power. In practice, this means qualifications, occupational closure, credentials and social networks also affect who gets access to higher incomes and secure careers.
New Right thinkers such as Charles Murray argue that some inequality reflects incentives and that welfare can create dependency. However, Marxists and many feminists criticise this view for individualising poverty and ignoring low pay, weak bargaining power, housing costs and unequal ownership of assets.
Patterns between social groups
The unequal distribution of poverty, income and wealth is not random. It follows patterned lines of social differentiation. Class remains central, but class interacts with gender, ethnicity, age and disability, so some groups face multiple disadvantages at once.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account