Taking Refuge - Buddha and Dhamma as refuges
Taking refuge directs Buddhist trust and practice towards the Buddha, Dhamma and Sangha. Explore why the first two jewels can guide a person after the historical Buddha's death, and judge how commitment relates to independent understanding.
The three jewels and taking refuge
Taking refuge means committing oneself to sources of guidance for freedom from suffering. The three jewels, also called the Triple Gem or Three Treasures, are Buddha, Dhamma and Sangha. A refuge offers an orientation amid the insecurity of samsara; it is not a promise that a believer will never become ill or encounter misfortune.
Khuddakapatha1 records the formula of going for refuge to each jewel, repeated three times. In different communities it may be recited in daily practice, in a ceremony of commitment or when beginning monastic training. Formal transmission, language and accompanying commitments vary. Saying the words makes the commitment explicit; their significance depends on understanding and conduct as well as sound.
The three refuges are connected. The Buddha awakens and teaches; the Dhamma is the teaching and truth disclosed; the Sangha preserves, practises and exemplifies the path. This lesson concentrates on Buddha and Dhamma, while the next examines the different meanings of Sangha. Dividing them helps explanation but does not make them three unrelated objects of allegiance.
For example, a person may bow before a Buddha image, study a discourse and attend a community meditation. The image recalls an awakened example; study directs attention to the teaching; shared practice supplies instruction and support. None of those actions alone guarantees insight. Refuge is most intelligible when these activities become a sustained relationship to the path rather than three disconnected rituals.
Historical Buddha and awakened ideal
Refuge in the Buddha can concern both Siddhartha Gautama as a teacher and Buddhahood as an ideal of awakening. The historical example gives the path a human narrative: a seeker recognises suffering, rejects unsuccessful extremes and teaches a liberating way. Buddhahood names the wisdom and freedom from defilements which make that example authoritative.
The distinction matters after his death. Refuge cannot depend on consulting the living Siddhartha in person. Recollection, images and narratives orient people towards his qualities; practising the Dhamma seeks understanding of what he realised. In SN22.87, seeing the Dhamma is connected with seeing the Buddha. This paraphrase supports the priority of insight over mere proximity to his body.
Theravada teaching commonly emphasises the historical Buddha as a fully awakened teacher whose achievement makes the path available. Mahayana traditions also speak of other Buddhas and develop accounts of Buddhahood beyond one historical lifespan. Devotion to a Buddha such as Amitabha illustrates how refuge can involve trust in compassionate assistance. These are diverse developments, not a claim that every Buddhist treats Siddhartha as a creator or that all Mahayana devotion takes one identical form.
A challenge to the ideal is that it may seem unattainable: how can an ordinary person imitate complete awakening? The reply is that an ideal can direct gradual training without requiring immediate equality with the exemplar. A second challenge concerns supernatural elaboration and authority: reverence may make questioning difficult. The strongest defence connects confidence to teachings and practice, rather than treating an image or title as sufficient evidence of every claim.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account