Augustine’s Teaching on Human Nature - The Fall, desire and human society
Explore how Augustine reads the Fall as a change in human love, freedom and relationships, and assess whether that account needs a historical first sin.
Creation, friendship and the Fall
Augustine begins with a good creation, rather than a naturally evil human body. God creates Adam and Eve with reason and a will capable of loving God and one another in an ordered way. In City of God XIV.16–26, he presents their original relationship as peaceful companionship: friendship and marriage need not involve domination, shame or uncontrolled desire. They could have had children without rebellious lust. Sexual embodiment is therefore not itself the Fall.
Genesis 3 describes the serpent's temptation, eating the forbidden fruit, shame, hiding, mutual blame and expulsion. Augustine interprets the disobedience as an inward turning from God towards the self. Pride precedes the outward act: finite creatures prefer their own authority to the source of their good. The resulting disorder is punishment and consequence, not an evil substance God originally manufactured.
This distinguishes the biblical narrative from its theological interpretation. Genesis 3 does not explicitly explain inherited sin through sexual intercourse. Augustine draws that wider doctrine from his understanding of human solidarity, desire and Scripture. A defence of the narrative alone therefore does not establish every part of his interpretation.
Desire and inherited Original Sin
For Augustine, concupiscence is disordered desire: love of lower goods becomes resistant to the rule of reason and love of God. Sexual arousal, which does not always obey deliberate intention, exemplifies the loss of inner harmony. Lust and selfishness also affect ambition, possessions and the wish to dominate; his account is broader than sexual misconduct.
Original Sin means humanity's inherited fallen condition, distinguished from each person's particular wrongful acts. Augustine teaches that it is transmitted through generation involving sexual intercourse and concupiscence. His On Marriage and Concupiscence distinguishes the good of marriage and children from the disorder involved in fallen desire. This is a theological account of descent from Adam, not a verified genetic mechanism. It does not mean every sexual act or newborn deliberately commits Adam's act.
Christian interpretations differ. The Catholic Catechism 404–405 describes Original Sin as a condition contracted rather than a personal fault committed by each descendant, with nature wounded rather than destroyed. Orthodox accounts commonly emphasise inherited mortality and corruption while resisting inherited personal blame. These differences matter: rejecting one explanation of transmission need not mean rejecting every Christian account of the Fall.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account