Meditation - Jhanas, benefits and secular practice
Meditative attainment and practical benefit are related but different claims. Examine the jhanas, compare Buddhist liberation with secular therapeutic aims, and judge meditation's importance and social effects without assuming every use has the same purpose or outcome.
The four jhanas
Jhana, or dhyana, describes meditative absorption or collected concentration. DN 2, the Fruits of the Contemplative Life, presents four stages in a wider account of ethical and contemplative training. The descriptions below paraphrase Thanissaro Bhikkhu's translation.
The first jhana involves withdrawal from sensuality and unwholesome states, with directed thought and evaluation, often rendered applied and sustained thought, alongside rapture and pleasure. In the second, directed thought and evaluation subside; internal assurance and unification accompany rapture and pleasure born of concentration. In the third, rapture fades while equanimity, mindfulness and clear awareness remain with pleasure. In the fourth, pleasure and pain are relinquished; neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling accompanies purified equanimity and mindfulness.
The progression is not simply increasing excitement. More refined steadiness involves relinquishing earlier features. Equanimity does not mean unconsciousness, and the fourth is not an absence of awareness. Interpretations differ about absorption's depth and relation to sensory awareness; Thanissaro's Thai Forest account emphasises broad bodily awareness and rejects a mindless-trance description.
Jhana can provide a stable basis for insight and weaken the immediate domination of hindrances. It is not identical with nirvana: a conditioned meditative attainment can end, and attachment to its pleasure can itself become an obstacle. A complete liberating account needs wisdom as well as concentration. Thus an impressive experience is not, by itself, evidence that craving has permanently ceased.
Religious and secular aims
Whether meditation has to be religious depends partly on what is being practised and what gives it direction. A Buddhist context places attention within ethics, right view and freedom from samsara. A secular context may adapt attentional practices towards stress management or recognition of habitual reactions without requiring commitment to rebirth or nirvana.
Bhikkhu Bodhi's Two Styles of Insight Meditation contrasts secular benefit-oriented and Buddhist liberation-oriented frameworks. His two styles are not samatha and vipassana. He recognises benefits for people outside Buddhist commitment while arguing that full Buddhist practice involves confidence and right view directed to liberation. The distinction concerns purpose and interpretation, not whether a non-Buddhist can attend carefully.
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, MBCT, is one concrete therapeutic adaptation. Research examines clinical outcomes rather than spiritual attainment. The 2015 PREVENT trial compared MBCT with support to taper medication against maintenance antidepressant treatment for recurrent depression; it did not demonstrate superiority for MBCT over 24 months. That result neither makes every mindfulness intervention ineffective nor proves Buddhist claims about liberation. Different practices, populations and comparisons matter.
Benefits may include improved recognition of reactions and reduced distress in some contexts, but outcomes are variable and difficult experiences can occur. A report of calm is not a universal guarantee or a substitute for an account of practice and evidence. A careful judgement allows secular use while recognising that removing Buddhist commitments changes the scope of the claim being made.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account