Kindertransport: Practice Plan: Identity Across Two Times
Build a qualified thesis and choose evidence that moves an argument from separation to adaptation and its later consequences.
Read the question
The teaching connects selected passages from the 2008 edition. Episode summaries and hypothetical production choices are identified separately; a whole-play interpretation draws on your study of the complete play.
How does Diane Samuels use dramatic methods to present the effects of displacement on identity and family relationships across Kindertransport?
Use this example question to practise planning a developing argument.
Before choosing evidence, turn each phrase into a planning requirement:
| Prompt phrase | What the plan must do | A mistake to avoid |
|---|---|---|
| How does Diane Samuels use dramatic methods | Connect a precise choice in language, dramatic form, structure or stagecraft to meaning and a possible audience effect. | Listing devices or discussing characters as though the play were prose. |
| the effects of displacement | Show consequences and development: what forced separation changes, pressures or leaves unresolved. | Giving a history paragraph or merely stating that Eva travels to England. |
| on identity and family relationships | Explain the relationship between the ideas: identity is remade through family separation, care, secrecy and discovery. | Planning one half on identity and another unrelated half on family. |
| across Kindertransport | Select separated stages because together they establish, develop and qualify one argument. | Mentioning the beginning, middle and end without explaining how the argument changes. |
The complete official Assignment A gives equal weight to AO1 and AO2. The plan must therefore make both kinds of thinking visible:
- AO1: a defensible thesis, accurate whole-play knowledge, discriminating scene choices and
an informed personal judgement. - AO2: analysis of how language, form, structure and performance create meanings and can
position an audience.
Historical grounding may clarify why Eva's departure is forced, but AO4 is not assessed in Assignment A. Context has no separate plan section or mark route.
Build a qualified whole-play thesis
A thesis is the plan's answer in compressed form. It gives every later section a different part of the same argument to develop.
Make four decisions:
- Central relationship: how does forced displacement connect identity change with family
relationships? - Direction: what develops from Eva's departure to Evelyn's later family conflict?
- Qualification: what evidence prevents the answer becoming absolute?
- Route: which separated stages will establish, develop and qualify that judgement?
A weak thesis repeats the prompt: “Samuels shows that displacement affects identity and families.” It names the topic but gives the plan no direction.
One more useful route is:
Samuels presents displacement as both life-saving separation and a lasting pressure on
identity: the two-time structure shows Eva building a genuine English life while the return
of documents, family claims and the Ratcatcher motif reveals what that adaptation has
excluded, so disclosure offers connection without guaranteeing repair.
This thesis makes a judgement but also limits it. “Genuine English life” prevents a simplistic claim that Evelyn's identity is false. “Without guaranteeing repair” prevents Faith's discovery from becoming a cure. The forecast also gives later sections different jobs: origin, development and consequence.
A different thesis may emphasise protection and abandonment, belonging and concealment, or agency and loss. It remains defensible if it answers the question, ranges across the play and tests its preferred reading against awkward evidence.
Choose evidence with different jobs
Whole-play range is not valuable by itself. Each selected scene must move the thesis by doing a different job.
| Argument job | Precise scene territory | AO1 work | AO2 route | Limit to preserve |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Establish the cause and tension | Act 1, Scene 1: Helga prepares Eva's forced departure while Faith's later move is placed nearby. | Displacement protects Eva from danger and ruptures the first family relationship. | Dual chronology and an unequal structural parallel let the audience compare two parent-child separations. | Faith's chosen adult move echoes separation but is not equivalent to refugee flight. |
| Develop adaptation and concealment | Act 1, Scene 2: Eva adjusts to English life with Lil while Faith encounters the 1941 letter. | Adaptation creates belonging, but the excluded earlier identity becomes part of Faith's family claim. | Changing language, the visible document and two-time structure alter character and audience knowledge. | English identity is not merely false; secrecy can protect Evelyn and damage Faith. |
| Deepen the pressure on identity | Act 2, Scene 1 reveals adoption and naturalisation; Scene 2 adds baptism. | English belonging gains family, religious and civic forms that cannot restore the interrupted first life. | Accumulation and juxtaposition place security beside loss. | The three identity decisions are distinct and should not be reduced to one vague symbol. |
| Show consequence and qualify resolution | Act 2, Scene 2: Helga and Evelyn confront one another; family objects move into Faith's handling or keeping; the final Ratcatcher shadow returns. | Displacement continues to shape biological, adoptive and filial relationships. | Motif reversal, prop transfer, structural return and a stage-wide final image keep transmission beside unresolved fear. | Disclosure permits connection but proves neither complete healing nor total hopelessness. |
The Act 1, Scene 2 row is especially efficient because it joins the prompt's ideas rather than illustrating only one theme. Here is the full planning reasoning:
- Point: displacement makes adaptation necessary, but concealment later turns identity
change into family conflict. - Precise evidence: Eva's developing English is placed in the same dramatic sequence as
Faith's encounter with the 1941 letter. - Dramatic mechanism: two times remain in active relation, while the visible document
changes who can know and question the past. - Meaning and possible audience effect: spectators can connect Eva's adaptation with
Evelyn's secrecy before every character accepts that connection, which may create sympathy,
tension or frustration. - Whole-play link: the scene develops the opening separation into a later struggle over
who can define the family story. - Qualification: Faith's claim to ancestry is defensible, but Evelyn's wish to control
painful disclosure need not be dismissed.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account