Death and the King's Horseman: Drums, Dance and Dramatic Worlds
Explore how drums, movement, costume and public voices create the play's dramatic worlds. Follow the difference between understanding a ceremony and having the power to interrupt it.
Hearing dramatic information
Text
Death and the King’s Horseman
By Wole Soyinka — Scene 2, extract, pp. 30.
Reading context: Ceremonial drums can be heard at the bungalow. Joseph has been asked what they mean.
JANE: Never mind. Listen Joseph, just tell me this. Is that drumming connected with dying or anything of that nature?
JOSEPH: Madam, this is what I am trying to say: I am not sure. It sounds like the death of a great chief and then, it sounds like the wedding of a great chief. It really mix me up.
PILKINGS: Oh get back to the kitchen. A fat lot of help you are.
JOSEPH: Yes master. (Goes.)
A dramatic world is the network of places, sounds, movements, relationships and rules that a play makes present in performance. In Death and the King's Horseman, sound does not merely decorate that world. It carries information, coordinates public action and reveals differences in understanding.
Scene 1 opens in the market with Elesin moving among drummers, praise singers and the women. The sound is public: it announces status, draws a community around the action and helps turn Elesin's stated duty into a witnessed ceremony. The audience does not simply hear about a social role; it hears that role being performed.
The move to the Pilkings bungalow in Scene 2 creates an abrupt acoustic contrast. A gramophone initially plays a tango; it is stopped when Amusa interrupts. Later, ceremonial drums are heard from elsewhere. This is a contrast within the scene, not an instruction to play both sounds continuously together. Joseph recognises the sounds of both a chief’s death and a wedding, but explicitly admits uncertainty. Pilkings depends on others to interpret the sound, then dismisses Joseph’s qualified account. Joseph has relevant knowledge, not an infallible decoding of events. Sound therefore separates power from understanding: the colonial official can issue orders, but he cannot securely read the event he intends to control.
This contrast also joins the two spaces. The market and bungalow are not sealed-off worlds presented one after the other; offstage sound makes them simultaneous. An audience may understand more than Pilkings does, creating dramatic irony and making his confident intervention appear less informed.
Movement, costume and authority
Text
Death and the King’s Horseman
By Wole Soyinka — Scene 3, extract, pp. 37.
Reading context: The market girls confront the constables.
(With a sudden movement they snatch the batons of the two constables. They begin to hem them in.)
GIRL: What next? We have your batons? What next? What are you going to do?
(With equally swift movements they knock off their hats.)
GIRL: Move if you dare. We have your hats, what will you do about it? Didn’t the white man teach you to take off your hats before women?
IYALOJA: It’s a wedding night. It’s a night of joy for us. Peace . . .
GIRL: Not for him. Who asked him here?
GIRL: Does he dare go to the Residency without an invitation?
GIRL: Not even where the servants eat the left-overs.
GIRLS (in turn. In an ‘English’ accent): Well well it’s Mister Amusa. Were you invited? (Play-acting to one another. The older women encourage them with their titters.)
- Your invitation card please?
- Who are you? Have we been introduced?
- And who did you say you were?
Soyinka repeatedly makes bodies, clothing and ceremonial objects carry meaning. A useful analysis therefore asks four questions: who performs, where, for whom, and with what power? The same action, such as dancing or dressing, can mean something very different when any of those conditions changes.
| Moment | What an audience sees | What the performance can reveal |
|---|---|---|
| Scene 1 market procession and dressing | Elesin moves within a group and is dressed through communal action | His public identity is produced with the community; honour and ceremony are embodied rather than privately claimed |
| Scene 2 bungalow dance | The Pilkingses dance to European music while wearing egungun clothing for entertainment | Clothing that carries ancestral significance within the play's represented world is treated as detachable costume; Amusa's reaction exposes the limits of the Pilkingses' understanding |
| Scene 3 girls' imitation | The girls copy colonial voices and procedures, then take the constables' batons | Mimicry becomes metatheatre: official authority can be reproduced as a role and temporarily turned against its performers |
| Scene 3 ceremonial movement | Elesin's dance, the Praise-Singer's calls and the surrounding group concentrate attention on an approaching transition | Movement becomes action within the ceremony, not an illustration of a decision already made |
| Scene 4 Residency ball | Uniform, costume, rank and coordinated social behaviour create an imperial spectacle | Colonial society also depends on ceremony and performed hierarchy, even while its officials dismiss the meaning of another ceremonial world |
These moments should not be flattened into a claim that all dance is equivalent. The Scene 3 girls can temporarily reverse the appearance of power, but colonial force has not disappeared. Similarly, the Residency ball and the market ceremony both use costume and spectators, yet one institution has the legal and physical power to interrupt the other.
The repetition is structurally important because it unsettles an easy opposition between a "ritual" Yoruba world and a supposedly non-ritual British one. Both worlds perform status. The sharper difference concerns what participants believe their performance means, how well they interpret other performances and whose version of order can be enforced.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account