3.3.1.2 - Conservatism - Principles, Strands and Debates

3.3.1.2 - Conservatism - Principles, Strands and Debates

This lesson teaches AQA conservatism through its core principles, its main strands from traditional conservatism to the New Right, and its internal debates about human nature, the state, society and the economy. It uses Hobbes, Burke, Oakeshott, Rand and Nozick as named thinker evidence, but it does not turn the lesson into biographies or cover every possible conservative thinker.

Nature of Conservatism

It is also a disputed political attitude: some conservatives treat it less as a fixed blueprint and more as a cautious way of judging political change.

Conservatism

A political ideology that values order, continuity, inherited institutions and the protection of property.

The central conservative question is:

Plain text
How can political order be preserved when human beings are imperfect, society is complex and change can have unintended consequences?

That question explains why conservatism often begins with caution. Conservatives do not usually argue that everything old is good. They argue that established institutions and practices may contain wisdom that no single generation fully understands. Reform may be necessary, but it should normally be gradual, practical and respectful of existing social bonds.

This creates a key debate about the nature of conservatism:

View of conservatismWhat it meansWhy it matters
A dispositionConservatism is a cautious habit of mind: prefer the tested to the untested, the familiar to the abstract, and gradual reform to sudden reconstruction.This links strongly to Burke and Oakeshott.
A doctrine of orderConservatism is a set of claims about authority, obedience, law and security.This links strongly to Hobbes and traditional concern with order.
A property and market ideologyConservatism protects private property, free exchange and limits on state redistribution.This links strongly to Rand, Nozick and the New Right.
A defence of societyConservatism sees society as more than isolated individuals, with duties, traditions and institutions that bind people together.This creates tension with more individualist New Right conservatism.

The phrase "change to conserve" captures much of the ideology. Conservatives may accept change when it protects the deeper order of society. They are suspicious of radical change when it tries to rebuild politics from abstract principles such as perfect equality, perfect liberty or perfect rational design.

Core Principles

AQA names government, the free market, the individual, authority, tradition and private property as core conservative terms. These ideas do not always fit together neatly, which is why conservatism is rich material for essay debate.

PrinciplePrecise meaningConservative reasoningInternal tension
Human imperfectionHuman beings are limited by selfishness, insecurity, habit, emotion or imperfect reason.Politics should not assume that people can be made perfect through reform.Hobbes is deeply pessimistic; Rand and Nozick have more confidence in rational individuals.
AuthorityLegitimate power to give rules, maintain order and command obedience.Without authority, liberty can collapse into insecurity and conflict.Strong authority can protect order, but it can also threaten liberty and property.
TraditionInherited practices, customs and institutions passed down over time.Traditions may embody accumulated experience and bind generations together.Tradition can preserve wisdom, but it can also preserve injustice or inefficiency.
Organic societySociety is an interdependent whole, not just a collection of separate individuals.Institutions such as family, local community, religion, Parliament, monarchy or property can create belonging and duty.New Right individualism often treats society more as voluntary exchange between individuals.
Private propertyThe legal right to own, use, transfer and inherit resources.Property gives people security, independence, responsibility and a stake in order.Large inequalities may threaten social cohesion, while heavy redistribution may threaten property rights.
The free marketEconomic exchange shaped mainly by private choice, competition and prices rather than state direction.Markets reward effort, protect choice and limit state power.Traditional conservatives may accept market limits when social stability is at risk.

The state is therefore necessary but dangerous. Conservatives usually reject anarchism because authority is needed to secure order. Yet many also fear an overactive state that tries to redesign society, weaken property, regulate voluntary action or replace local institutions.

The individual is important, but conservatives disagree about how to understand individual freedom. Traditional conservatives often see individuals as shaped by family, culture, religion, class, nation and history. New Right conservatives place more weight on self-reliance, personal responsibility and market choice.

Active reading: Which conservative principle most clearly creates a tension between traditional conservatism and the New Right?

Traditional Conservatism

It tends to be sceptical about abstract theories that promise to remake society. Its core belief is not that the present is perfect, but that society is too complex to be safely redesigned from first principles.

Traditional conservatism

The strand that places order, authority, tradition and organic society at the centre of politics.

Three AQA named thinkers help show this strand:

ThinkerHuman natureStateSocietyEconomy
Thomas HobbesHumans are vulnerable, self-protective and easily drawn into conflict when no common authority exists.The sovereign must be strong enough to secure peace and prevent a return to disorder.Society depends on security; order comes before higher moral or cultural goals.Economic life needs peace and law before industry, exchange or property can be secure.
Edmund BurkeHumans reason imperfectly and need inherited practices, habits and duties.The state should preserve order and allow prudent, gradual reform.Society is a partnership between the living, the dead and those yet to be born.Property matters, but it sits inside a wider moral and social order.
Michael OakeshottHumans rely on practical judgement and tradition, not only technical rules or abstract reason.Government should be sceptical of grand projects and avoid turning politics into a plan for perfection.Society is sustained by familiar practices and ways of doing things.The economy should not be treated as a machine that can be fully directed by rational design.

Hobbes is useful because he shows why conservatives fear disorder. If individuals judge everything for themselves without a common power, conflict becomes likely. For Hobbes, the individual seeks self-protection, so the state must be strong enough to make peace reliable.

Burke is useful because he shows the conservative defence of tradition and gradual reform. His reaction to the French Revolution was not a rejection of all political change. He supported practical arguments about American colonial rights, but he opposed revolutionary politics that uprooted institutions in the name of abstract reason.

Oakeshott is useful because he explains conservative scepticism about rationalism.

Rationalism in politics

Treating politics as if it can be solved by technical rules, plans or ideology.

Oakeshott argues that politics requires judgement, experience and sensitivity to context.

Traditional conservatism can be summarised as a process map:

Plain text
Human imperfection
-> need for order and authority
-> respect for inherited institutions
-> cautious reform when change is necessary
-> preservation of social continuity

This strand is strongest when explaining why sudden reform can be risky. Its weakness is that it can sound like a defence of existing power, hierarchy or privilege even when those arrangements are unfair.

Continue this lesson.

You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.

Create free account